
A collection of Neil Milton's writing, featuring published reviews and other texts
Blake Crouch – Dark Matter Review
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
An interesting take on the thriller
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 15 January 2021
​
I'd heard good things about this book. I'd also heard some underwhelming things. I decided to judge for myself. It's a quick read and one that I could not put down. It's written in a very economical way with not an unnecessary word. He utilises a lot of short paragraphs written like pragmatic prose poetry. He has a great way with language that is very stylish and contemporary. The descriptions are so compressed that they convey a lot with very little. This is what makes it such a quick read.
​
As for the story, it's an interesting conceit grounded in real science that he conveys in a concise and comprehensible way. This enables him to write about different realities. I would have liked a lot more explanation of this, as it was this aspect of the story that was most interesting. There was potential to do some very exciting things with this. The final chase aspect of the story that unfolds was a little unspectacular. I would have liked for there to be stronger motivations and a little bit more depth to the story than what transposes. The coda that the protagonist endures hardships just to appreciate his partner more is a bit trite, and I could see this coming from a long way off. The subplot with the other female character created a little tension, but I felt was a bit underdeveloped. There is perhaps some symbolism in his partner's installation in its diverging paths that adds another element, but I found the book to be a bit disposable. It's would make for a cool film, but perhaps a slightly superficial one. On the whole, a satisfying read that hints at interesting things but might leave you wanting more. Maybe there is room for sequels.
Blake Crouch – Recursion
​
5 out of 5 stars
​
A heartfelt romance about coming to terms with loss amidst an ingenious high concept sci-fi thriller
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 6 June 2021
If I were to pitch this book, I would describe it as:
See You Yesterday x Flatliners x Edge of Tomorrow via Christopher Nolan (with a hint of Groundhog Day)
​
Although there was much to admire about Dark Matter, it left me a little underwhelmed. Crouch has certainly upped the ante in this one. Some have criticised it for being implausible, but this is fiction and the book's central conceit seems robust enough to support the time twisting narrative, which is ultimately what it's about. How it's accomplished is almost irrelevant. It's a standalone novel, but something of a continuation of the emotional themes explored in his previous novel. There are some original locations and the idea of the false memories is an aspect of the time travelling genre underexplored. The set-pieces are also on a whole other scale - I think he could push it even further in his next offering. As others have said, it's an absolute page turner. A real fun holiday read with deeper reverberations and enough scientific grit to ponder. If I were to recommend any improvements, I would say that the characters could be somewhat more idiosyncratic. Although realised enough to be believable, I felt there was little particular to them. He has said in an interview that the career of Barry was not much of a concern for him, but I feel making him a cop specifically could have fed into the narrative more, other than enabling him to carry a gun (he certainly should have more quirks stemming from this lifestyle that are unique to such a role). Admittedly, in such a high concept story, the characters are almost secondary to the set pieces (like most blockbusters), but some economically rendered traits would have given this fresh new take on the genre slightly less generic, particularly in a story where they are the heart of the story (the story of the daughter however is particularly moving and Helena's motivations are heartfelt, so it is apparent to some degree).
Bush – Black an White Rainbows
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
Back and better than on form
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 29 March 2017
​
Like many of their fans, I have been listening to Bush since back in the day. They saw me through my angsty years, tears and all. I caught what I believe was their first television performance on 'Hotel Babylon', playing 'Machinehead'. I never really bought into the brit pop scene and I found many of Nirvana's lyrics to be somewhat puerile, albeit being sonically superior. They may have been considered by some to be Nirvana-lite, but I preferred the facsimile. Gavin has been emulating the transatlantic grunge growl ever since. Fortunately, of late, he has begun to drop much of the affectation. With 'Rainbows' his voice is much smoother and far more authentic in tone.
​
They haven't, however, lost any of their ability to rock. Admittedly, the album sounds much more polished than previous output, but I can barely listen to a lot of their songs nowadays, as they sound too raw. Another reason I can't listen to most of them are the lyrics. They have always been questionable, and for every distinctive image ('stereo waltz') and truthful lyric ('everything's more than it seems') there's a resoundingly duff one ('your cinematic love truck'). There's still the odd clunker of a line here, as previous reviews have noted (undermining a sincere lyric with 'once I was inside her', making it seem like the whole relationship was about sex, and 'even lions get scared sometimes', which seems aimed at a much younger audience, as I felt 'Loneliness is a Killer' was on the previous album.) You get the sense that Gavin has been battling for some time with finding his true self, having maybe compromised his integrity within his relationship to Gwen, and, at times, his lyrics feel similarly undermined. He's no philosopher himself, but it is almost as if he is addressing a more superficial person than himself ('love like candy', 'strawberry love overload').
​
The overwhelming sense is that, as shallow as the music presents his relationship to have been, he does genuinely love Gwen, who it's pretty safe to say the whole album is about. I'm pleased to hear that he has retained the romantic feel that started to show through on his previous album ('The Gift', 'Surrender'). I think that it is this, and the feminine quality to the lyrics, that gives this album a much more mature vibe ('sister rose', 'when the blossom blows', 'you've got to be like water'). He certainly charts new territory with 'Toma Mi Corazon' (Spanish), and seems to be almost channelling David Bowie with his delivery on 'Sky Turns Day Glo'. I think 'All the Worlds Within You', although a great song, would be better if the line was 'murder in our homes', rather than 'murder in the houses'.
​
They have always been somewhat derivative a band, but they always put their own distinctive spin on things, which I, personally, prefer, however, 'Ray of Light' was too famously a Madonna song to adopt as a title, even if it might be a reference to Gwen's allegedly distant cousin. There's certainly nothing wrong with pop stylings, nor is there in being radio friendly, something, perhaps, he learned from his former partner. He seems to have learned in 'Lost in You', much as Nirvana did, that a successful rock song sounds like a lullaby for grown-up girls. Besides, the gnarly texture is still there in the guitars, which underpins the smoothness of the lyrics perfectly. The guitars on Dystopia sound like classic 'Bush'. I was underwhelmed when I initially heard 'The Beat of Your Heart' single, but it sits well within the context of the album, although I can't help but think of 'Murder on the Dancefloor', by Sophie Ellis Bextor, which I cannot stand.
​
The songs on the album definitely get weaker as it progresses, but it is bookended by 'Mad Love' and 'People at War', probably the strongest tracks, the latter being refreshingly un-self involved, so you can easily forget the slight indistinctness towards the end, besides, it's the overall feel of the album that is its strength, and so what if there is a little filler on there, if it continues that vibe, that's fine by me. Ultimately, it's a very winning album, and I, for one, can certainly forgive the mild irritations. Great album cover, too, the album title seemingly being a reference to Massive Attack's 'Heligoland.
​
On another note, I recently attended their gig 'Bush @ Bush'. It was a fantastically lythe performance, and the new songs sounded fantastic. It was slightly unfortunate that they did not play more of them, and people seemed disappointed that they did not play their refugee song. It would have been a beautiful moment for my partner who is herself a refugee. His outfit was next level cool, and he was clearly working it hard, complete with mid-crowd interaction, if only he would sort out the dodgy bleaching of his hair (perhaps the blonde is a way of hanging onto Gwen). Having seen him tour for 'The Sea of Memories' album, he has still not learned to curtail the egotistical ramblings between songs, perhaps encouraged by the voice he has been given on the, erm, you know.
Bush – I Beat Loneliness Review
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
A solid album from post-grunge stalwarts
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 23 July 2025
​
Rossdale and co. return on Bush’s 10th album, I Beat Loneliness, after 2022’s The Art of Survival. That was a heavy album for the band and this latest fare is no different, for the most part. The opening tracks of the album prove to be their heaviest output yet, utilising drop tuned guitars once again.
​
The album opens with ‘Scars’, driven by electronic beats and accompanied by a deep synth, before the guitars kick in - familiar territory of late. However, the guitars are only momentary as the verse is stripped back, which makes their onslaught kick in even more strongly when they return. The lyrics are about overcoming adversity and existing as a survivor. It proves to be a sufficient introduction to the album.
​
This is followed by the title track, opening with filtered guitars before coming in full force. This track is much more melodic; its titular refrain somewhat anthemic. There is a particularly gnarly guitar riff at the midpoint. What is most evident is Nik Hughes’ drumming, on this track and throughout the album. The production of them is tight and punchy, clearly deploying parallel processing. There’s a very economical drum break at one point which is very effective. It’s redolent of the album as a whole - not over indulgent. The song ends with feedback, fading out and into recent single ‘The Land of Milk and Honey’.
​
TLOMH already feels like a classic in their repertoire. The opening bass is gnarly and the overall feel is foreboding. The guitars are massive and Gavin’s lyrics are defiant. The bridge seriously rocks, with some mammoth guitar chords and some kicking drumming, leading into the guitar solo, which sings out from the wall of sound. It doesn’t outstay its welcome at just over three minutes.
​
This is followed by the dubby, ‘We Are All the Same on the Inside’, this time driven by a drum machine, which opens with a dexterous and engaging bass riff from Corey Britz. It opens out into an equally anthemic track as the latter. The lyrics feel confessional and affirming. Its brief quiet moment is a welcome refrain midst the maelstrom, serving to emphasise the sonic assault all the more.
​
‘I Am Here to Save Your Life’ opens with an awesome experimental synth and a faster tempo to the former. It’s a driving track and the paradoxical lyrics sit well with the track. I’m not so sure about killing Buddha, but I was certainly tripping when I saw God. There’s some nice sub bass interspersed at key moments in the track. The band has always flirted with electronics, but here they are front and centre. Showing, much like the Deftones recently did on Ohms, that there is a welcome place for it in rock music. Perhaps this will remind Billy Corgan of The Smashing Pumpkins the right way to deploy synths, after a few mediocre efforts in the not too distant past (they certainly made up for it on Aghori Mori Mei).
​
Listeners will already be familiar with ’60 Ways to Forget People’, the shortest track on the album. The drums hit hard and the guitars growl and soar midst feedback and distortion. I’ve always been somewhat dubious of the seemingly arbitrary way Gavin deploys numbers in his songs. They seem to be used more rhythmically and for the purpose of rhyming rather than signifying much. However, it really works on this song. This is another dark and gnarly track with a reversed synth melody. It’s a song about redemption with a nice motorway extended metaphor. Although, I will say, the chorus is a bit similar to ‘All Things Must Change’ off the last album. I found myself singing Walk like Superman to it.
​
‘Love Me Till the Pain Fades’ hits a little less hard than the preceding tracks and initially seems weaker than the previous. However, Corey’s hypnotic bass riff is great and the chorus is catchy. It’s underpinned with a trap style electronic drum beat, until Hughes’ muscular drumming hits. It’s a song about internal conflict and the transience of a temporary relationship as balm for suffering. It’s the synth heavy bridge and outro that makes the track, though. Marauding and dark, with atmospheric vocal washes, the synth oscillates ominously.
​
Next we have ‘We Are Of This Earth’, featuring a trip hop/ Bossa nova style beat with third-person verses about Gavin’s failed relationship. It’s a downtempo number and something of a bridge between the first and second half of the album. I’ve always been partial to their slower, quieter numbers, but this track is their weakest on the album. It doesn’t really go anywhere musically, apart from a nice glissando (?)
​
The album continues in a similarly quiet vein with ‘Everyone is Broken’, almost like a distant cousin of Black and White Rainbow’s ‘Lost in You’. Gavin seems to have taken a leaf from Jared Leto’s book on this track, with a chorus of female singers bolstering his vocals, albeit used more subtly than by 30STM. There is even some earnest spoken word.
​
Another mid-tempo track follows with ‘Don’t Be Afraid’. It’s mellow with nice synth pads and ambient washes accompanying acoustic guitar, interspersed with ethereal female vocals. The lyrics seem to be about not being detained by life’s obstacles, intermixed with Gavin’s feelings of heartbreak. The chorus is particularly moving with a great metaphor for life ‘It’s just a carousel of light and shade’. The line ‘maybe I’m the wolf that wanted more’ is particularly heartfelt in its delivery. I wonder if it’s an allusion to he children’s book ‘The Wolf that Wanted to Change His Color’, about trying to be other than what you are. Maybe he was just lust-hungry like the wolf.
​
‘Footsteps in the Sand’ opens strong with dark electronics. The lyrics aren’t overly complicated, but a timeworn metaphor for the transience of our existence on Earth, ‘footsteps in the sand’, is extended by comparing overarching life to sand in its more substantial yet still fragile state: glass, which seems to already be fragmented in Gavin’s case. Sandcastles are also evoked to suggest a respite in a home with weak foundations - something transient and unsustainable. However, the lyric into the cellophane is somewhat cryptic and a somewhat humorous image; it certainly makes for weak defences. As with TLOMH, the bridge is robust. I, for one, would welcome more of the intro section throughout their next album.
​
The album ends with ‘Rebel with a Cause’, a title that could have been pushed further. The ballad is a fitting closer to the album. Once again, this track has great atmospherics. Lyrically, it illustrates that personal barriers, like territorial borders - defences - only lead to war. Gavin bewails being unable to break patterns in his life, making change difficult, making him unable to rekindle his love. The outro references David Bowie’s song ‘Rebel, Rebel’, about youthful rebellion and challenging societal norms, especially around gender and sexuality. Maybe it’s pertinent.
​
Some may find the shift from post-grunge heavy rock into the mid-tempo and quieter ballads anticlimactic. I think this is more of a case of sequencing. It may well have been done so based upon lyrics, but a slight reshuffling might have made for a more fulfilling album as a whole. Personally, I think it’s great. Where I criticised the previous album for its lack of dynamic range and variety in timbre, this album is much more diverse. If I had a slight criticism, it’s that Gavin’s voice sounds a bit flat in its lower register, in places, which might be more indicative of his mental health than anything else. Despite these quibbles, the album is their most solidly produced to date.
​
9/8 - was just listening back to Corey’s album. There seems to be clear parallels with Corey’s song ‘Broken’ on ‘Everyone is Broken’.
Bush – The Art of Survival Review
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
From The Art of Walking to The Art of Survival
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 8 October 2022
​
Bush’s 9th studio album, following The Kingdom, opens with latest single, ‘Heavy is the Ocean’, on which, deep bass chords open, before rousing drums lead into ginormous riffing. It doesn’t let up much from that point onwards. Tapping a similar vein to its predecessor, this album is very much influenced by 90s nu metal. You might even call it a simulacrum of that, as their earlier output was a simulacrum of grunge. If you liked their last fare, you are in for a treat. Poetic lyrics seem to address a femme fatale figure, with whom Rossdale seems to surrender, whilst he pines for his former relationship, that he finally relinquishes. The weight of that burden appears to be the simile of the title.
​
The guitars on ‘Slow Me’ are much more symphonic, following a quiet/loud dynamic familiar to much of the genre – the quiet moments underpinned by a dextrous bass groove. The lyrics are tinged with nihilism, opining his emptiness inside and the frostiness of isolation, as well as an insatiable need he cannot fulfil. The chorus expresses his fear of letting go, whilst the second verse general conflict and misunderstanding. As the song progresses the guitars get increasingly more gnarly as Rossdale’s vocals echo, before abruptly ending.
​
First single ‘More than Machines’ follows – the most political track on the album, concerning itself with abortion and female agency, whilst Rossdale sings of apocalyptic survival, following capitalist destruction of the Earth. This is the ‘news in blood’ he opines (great line). However, having an invincible heart is a double-edged sword, as it’s impossible to feel with a metallic pump, and it’s such emotions that make us more than the very machines of the title. As a first single, it’s a serious statement of intent – it hits hard. The song is huge – the soaring guitars interspersed with delicate synth fills. Gavin seems to hit a new register with his vocals, too.
​
The guitars get gnarly on the industrial tinged ‘May Your Love Be Pure’. He opens with idioms, subverting the last to make a comment on the logging trade. As droughts inflict California it is a mental gamble when you have no destination. The only thing you can do is embrace the disorder of an itinerant life. He only hopes his expectant lover’s heart be pure, so that together they may fly in explosions of colour.
​
‘Shark Bite’ is a standout track – it sounds like classic Bush on steroids. Its lyrics are about self-discovery and regained integrity, despite feeling numb. The song seems to suggest that his former partner impeded on his music (took his fingers). A desire to be cleansed is followed by mixed metaphors about survival; the second verse expressing more of the natural devastation and the shackles of religion, yet he is resuscitated by his new femme fatale’s shark bite - her kiss like ‘infinite night’. The nihilism prevails; however, he embraces his alterity.
​
‘Human Sand’ has a refreshingly different timbre of guitar. The title perhaps not having the best metaphor, the song is a manifesto of belief. It is resolutely defiant in the face of adversity.
​
‘Kiss Me I’m Dead’ has an incredibly catchy melodic chorus – Rossdale’s silky voice taking on an almost stately quality, much like Bowie’s later developed. The lyrics were not currently available, however Rossdale sings of his resuscitation and salvation at the lips of his lover. Once again, he intones about the destruction of the rainforests and the fate of animals.
‘Identity’ is perhaps the most generic track. He sings about the female dichotomy of a binary world, however, it could have been more subtly expressed.
​
‘Creatures of the Fire’ is a respite from the cacophony. It’s one of my personal favourites from the album – a ballad seemingly set to a drum pad and mournful synths. Gavin’s ballads have always been his strength. He sings of a last burst of passion before being expunged. The political creeps in again, as he criticises the chief of police.
​
Judas appears in Rossdale’s lyrics, not for the first time, on ‘Judas is a Riot’. The guitars return in force. Like Janus he simultaneously looks back on the kaleidoscope of the past and the uncertainty of the future. The lyrics seem to suggest the carnage of betrayal and embracing the devastation. The song is elevated by dark synths, if only there was more of this throughout the album. The Deftones have certainly embraced it.
​
‘Gunfight’ expresses an absence of faith in sorrow. Lyrics concern war and global warming and being unequipped for a confrontation. The chorus is the highlight with Rossdale exercising his pipes once again. The breakdown is subtle, but left me wanting more.
​
Closer, ‘1000 Years’, takes the tempo right down with a trip hop style ending. Gavin seems to accept that he will never find another woman like his previous. He wishes for a slumber of a millennia when the world might be a better place, as it was always his fears that were an obstacle. As it stands, he appears to be slowly submerged in a drowning world. Whether inadvertently or not, his lyrics seem to reference Katy Perry.
​
I get that Rossdale wants to rock out, and maybe this is the music he always should have made, but, despite its wall of sound, it works best in its quieter moments when he expresses his vulnerability. This man has heart, and how well he affects us. If only he would afford himself the space to emote more; those guitars certainly are cathartic.
Bush – The Kingdom Review
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
A solid album of muscular rock ragers
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 19 July 2020
​
It's easy to be a critic, especially with the online disinhibition effect. As I'm beginning to realise, learning an instrument isn't easy. Making an album is difficult. All credit to anyone who makes one. To continually do so over an extended period is no mean feat. When a great album comes along, people tend to take it for granted, for the majority of the time it's about producing anything at all, let alone musical history.
​
I get it. People have an emotional investment in a band with whom they connect. It's such a thrill to hear music that seems to embody your spirit, with whom to soundtrack your moments - to suffuse your memories. There's not much better than hearing well constructed music. So, when a band comes along and does that, we have high expectations. People take it personally when those expectations aren't met - they're disappointed. A lot of hard work and practise goes into being that good - many don't succeed. If an album fails to live up to an artist's capabilities, it's easy to point the finger and say that was rubbish. What would be more useful would perhaps be to ask why is it not that good? Given the unlikely opportunity to respond to the artist in person, I think many would have more compassion. They're human after all - just people with ideas.
​
That is not to say that all of this is a long preamble to justify a terrible album. Far from it. I just felt that, as listeners, maybe people need reminding, whoever might be reading. As the headline to this review states, this is a solid album of muscular hard rock metal ragers with a sensitive heart at its core. If their previous album had a feminine energy to it, The Kingdom is the masculine antidote. It's a much harder fuller sounding album. The feminine still comes across in the lyrics ('We are the sons of the earth-made mothers/ Blood river, let it all go'), but this is less romantic and more all out rock.
​
Admittedly, on a perfunctory listen, it sounds like a collection of generic rock/ metal standards. You are not immediately struck by its uniqueness, but, upon repeat listens on a decent sound system/ headphones (and not an internal computer speaker) reveal more intricacies and there is just enough studio trickery to keep it interesting. Personal favourites will be subjective, but, for me, for what it's worth, standouts are The Kingdom, Quicksand and Undone, but there is a lot to like throughout the album, the singles included. I'd say it's somewhat frontloaded (a few songs in the second half of the album are not quite so distinctive) and it has somewhat of a similar energy throughout (although energy it has in spades). The only time it lets up is with the vulnerable and emotionally honest 'Undone', with which Gavin can showcases his songwriting abilities. It's all the more poignant when you know a semblance of the public narrative. On the whole, the album could have benefitted from more varied dynamics throughout for more variety, but I'm no expert. Not that I'm a spokesperson, but I would say that most Bush fans would be happy with this album. It's certainly given me something decent to listen to until the next one comes along. Definitely one to hear live.
Clive Barker – Imajica Review
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
not so good the second time around
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 7 October 2013
​
Clive Barker was my favourite author as a teenager. I started off reading James Herbert's and Stephen King's novels and progressed to the aforementioned. I have since studied English Literature at uni. Eighteen years later I thought I'd revisit his works.
​
I thought I'd give Imajica a go first as it's his most epic. I downloaded a sample and it opened quite well, so decided to make a purchase. As another reviewer pointed out, the kindle version is riddled with typos and formatting errors. One thing I noted on this second reading is that even now, having read more literary novels, Barker has a very good vocabulary for a genre writer, although it does tend to run away from him at times. I have to agree with other reviewers in saying that his style does grow very tedious as the novel progresses. Upon re-reading I realise that elements of Weaveworld, Imajica, and the Books of the Art have blended together in my mind. The fantastical elements are not always that well described and some of the description of the action is confusing and difficult to visualise. I always enjoyed the sexual freedom of his works, often depicting same sex an opposite couplings in the same book, also the androgyny, but there is definitely a homosexual bias to his subtext, which I wasn't aware of when I was younger. I recall reading of something called 'the butt diggers choice' when glancing through one of his other books. It's also overtly Christian, which I found somewhat off-putting. I wasn't as amazed at the terrain in this book as I recall either. The book doesn't fully explore all dominions, and I felt a bit cheated by it all. It's just not a very good story. It's a bit rubbish really.
​
Having satisfied my nostalgic craving, I don't think I'll be returning to any other Clive Barker books. I tried the Abarat books, having read the first, and a large chunk of the second, and they're even worse. It just goes to show how much we grow as readers.
Clive Barker – The Great and Secret Show
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
​
Better than Imajica, but still not great
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 18 November 2013
​
After re-reading Imajica 18 years after I first read it, I swore off ever reading a Barker again. Then I espied TGASS in a charity shop for a quid and thought I'd give him another chance. This book is much more readable than the aforementioned, however I didn't finish it. It got tedious by the time of the party scene and I was getting tired of the profanities and the shear grotesquery of it (particularly the bestiality). I was particularly appalled by the liberal use of the C word. I really shan’t be reading another. I'm ashamed to say that I used to like these books.
Corey Britz - Slightly Exaggerated Tales of Past Events Review
​
5 out of 5 stars
​
A slightly understated review of limited hyperbole
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 2 October 2021
​
This is the debut album from Bush bassist, Corey Britz. As you can imagine, being a musician in a band of such calibre, it's an accomplished record. Featuring ten radio friendly tracks around the four minute mark, it doesn't outstay its welcome. Produced with a modern, clear sound, it opens with the vernacular titled 'She Come Ready'. You can hear a shared love with Gavin Rossdale for reggae lyrics, which suffuses this confident opener. The drums are punchy and the guitar at times soaring, others laid back. It's a smooth groove, underpinning Britz' tale of a fleeting seduction by a forward but distant woman. Setting the tone for the rest of the album, the chorus is catchy and romantic, as he sings of the inevitable. Corey is clearly smitten by his seducer, and it's sure to soundtrack many an intimate moment.
​
The single 'Humans' follows. I must admit, the first time I heard it through tinny computer speakers, prior to the album release, I wasn't overly enamoured. Having appraised it properly, through a half-decent soundsystem, I take it all back. The track, a dystopic tale of isolation and survivor guilt, couldn't be more relevant in this time of global pandemic. If I was being cynical, I would say that it is somewhat of a licensing cash-in, but it really would sound great on a film's closing credits. An infectious groove, the funk guitar verges on French House. Subtly interspersed with minor key synths and hand claps, there's plenty of space in the right places.
​
'Running from a Ghost' is a bright and airy affair, redolent of the best 80s pop rock, complete with soaring guitar solo. A descriptive tale, featuring idiomatic lyrics and metaphors, continuing the theme of loneliness, as a man tries to outpace his past indiscretions, told against an uplifting backdrop of instrumentation. It's just this kind of juxtaposition between form and content that I like (The Cure are excellent at this combination of melancholy lyrics and uplifting guitars, as are Pvris).
​
'Broken' is an uptempo number following on logically from the former. Soaring guitars rise above this full-bodied track. Having come to terms with his own fallibility and damage, as we all eventually do, this song is an acknowledgment of the universality of suffering, as Britz realises hiding is futile. A joyous celebration of life, it's affirming to the max.
​
'Rewind it' is more melancholy in tone, but still upbeat. Remorseful lyrics, referencing Tears for Fears, plead for forgiveness, as Corey regrets being unable to 'rewind' a mistake from his past. Once again permeated with funk guitar and a massive solo, sorrow has rarely felt so good. It then segues into desolate ambience, taking the track into altogether different territory (perhaps the barrenness of his guilt), evoking the likes of Brian Eno or Gary Numan, followed by a nostalgic cassette rewind before the track resumes. Like many of the tracks, it leaves you wanting more.
​
'Say Something' is more downtempo and romantic in tone, with even more epic 80s guitar solo. Once again, acknowledging his fallibility (a true sign of maturity), as he endures the silent treatment of a spurned lover. Midnight jazz club keyboards underpin his vocals, accompanied by breathy (synth?) female vocal ad libs, as he tries to win over his addressee. Surely, all is forgiven when you apologise this adroitly.
​
'Edge of the World' is another romantic affair. With lyrics similar in vein to Rita Ora's 'Your Song', (and the seemingly oxymoronic 'Lonely together') requesting a reprieve from sorrow (sad songs). This is a song of surrender to love and revelling in it at the liminal. It's easy listening at its least pejorative.
​
'The Violent Circus' is a stripped back sleazy number, until that chorus hits, and boy does it, and then the funk licks begin. If I had access to the lyrics, I'd better be able to ascertain the symbolic content, but surely it's a metaphor for life (we're all Lost in the Funhouse). He certainly understands his quiet/ loud dynamics (nice production warble).
​
'Better' sees Corey come full circle (having found his peace, now he's acknowledged the error of his ways, as he transcends). The summery funk rock feel abounds, as he reflects on late night shennanigans, of a love seemingly past. If only it always felt this good. Fortunately, he's sharing it with us all.
​
The album closer 'Love Somebody' is the final revelation of the album. A song of unrequited love, Corey appears to admit defeat. What could seem a downbeat finale overcomes with guitar virtuosity and a Beatlesesque chorus of warbly treated vocals. My only qualm is it's over too soon.
​
A very relatable album, with a unified sound, complete in it's journey, Corey is not afraid of being unashamedly populist. I get tired of writing bad reviews. Refreshingly, this has hit written all over it. Sure to be a future classic - I'm not sure even he realises just how good it is. I've certainly had it on permanent rotation (and every time I discover new nuances). This is the sound we all need right now. A promising solo career ahead, for sure.
​
Dave Eggers – A Hologram for the King Review
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
I've enjoyed all of his books that I've read
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 1 June 2015
​
I've a lot of respect for Dave Egger's writing. I've enjoyed all of his books that I've read. I was a little disappointed by The Circle. I liked the reality he created, but felt the story and characterisation were a bit weak. This book reminded me why I like Eggers. They are so of our present moment. I found the book to be near perfect. I noticed one cliche of expression and two minor grammatical errors. I found his sparse, economical style to be as cool as green tinted glass. I was reminded of his short story set in Egypt with the horses. It couples that same sense of futility with, as the opening quote primes the reader, a Beckettian ear for the absurd.
Dave Eggers – Heroes of the Frontier Review
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
Keep going Dave, we're counting on you.
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 1 January 2017
​
I find Mr Eggers, Dave, an inspiration as a writer. I have written before that I have much respect for him. I like the world he has created in this book, especially the nods to the 'Occupy' movement, and I am headed in a very similar direction to him. I presume the title is ironic as, for the large part, there is nothing heroic about this journey. It showed promise, but, on the whole, I found the book somewhat slight, particularly for the first half. Like others, I did not find the prissy protagonist, Josie, particularly convincing. She came across as a bit underdeveloped. The children were much better drawn.
​
I think the novel would have benefitted from much more of a sense of place. As someone who has never been to Alaska, I would have enjoyed more description of the terrain and the elements. I never really felt surrounded by the place depicted on the beautiful cover. For me, the occasional turn of phrase was not enough to fulfil me. A little more research would have given this book more depth and would have elevated it somewhat.
​
On a different note, I got the sense that the book was written from right to left as I was reading it. It was a most bizarre feeling, like the future appearing before me from the side, if that makes any sense.
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
The Idea is Better than the Execution
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 10 February 2015
​
I rate Eggers as a writer. I really enjoyed AHWSG and YSKOV, also his short stories in HWAH. (I've yet to read Zeitoun or AHFTK). I read some of WITW? and although worthy, found it a little righteous and gave up on it. I was nevertheless eager to read this novel. Finally, within my budget, I picked a copy up from a charity shop for a pound (it being advertised for 50p). A satire on privacy in the digital age, the book continues the legacy of Orwell's 1984 a book that I have yet to read in its entirety.
​
There are some nice ideas in there, but they aren't all dealt with particularly well. He presents a world which could well happen. I think the main problem is the protagonist is in her twenties and Eggers is no longer. I think he is trying to make a point about how trivial and vapid the new generation of young people are. They are idealistic and ferocious in their intellect, but also completely misguided and driven - it's a potentially dangerous combination. This is realistic, I've met some recent graduates like this, they are so adamant that they are right and just, having not really known fallibility, that they steamroll ahead naively trouncing all in their path with little respect for experience. Unfortunately, she also makes for a very weak character. Eggers is aware of this. He passes comment on her becoming more well-rounded at one point. I think he is trying to aim this book at that generation, but in doing so he alienates his peers by, as another reviewer has stated, explaining his wordplay and ideas as if we haven't understood them. It's like he doesn't really know this audience so well, he also passes comment about one of the characters not really knowing their audience. What I liked about his other work was that he didn't spell everything out to the reader. He respected our intellect, by presuming it. He does this in some places, when the older characters speak to her (clearly ciphers for his own opinions), but in others he does the opposite. I felt the descriptions of sex acts, although brief, were too explicit in their description. I would have thought that someone of his age and ability would have been more subtle. Calling the doctor Villalobos seemed like a blatant attempt to win cool points with the music savvy. Having studied creative writing at the institution, he momentarily won me over when he made props to UEA, but it was short-lived and felt like a somewhat weak ploy. I also appreciated the reference to veganism, but he undermined this somewhat by repeating the sentiment to a lesser degree with vegetarianism later in the book. Also, somewhere this progressive would not have leather seats.
​
The shark imagery was intriguing and I was expecting the book to explore deeper aspects in the final segment, but he did not develop this idea enough. As another reviewer also mentioned, he did not leave enough mystery for us to ponder. I also felt the couple on the lake were not explored enough. Too much emphasis was placed on kayaking extracts for there to be so little pay off concerning his themes. Despite its satirical portrayal of the invasion of privacy rights as the norm, it's all quite didactic. I also found the ending was rushed and was not fully earned. The fate of Annie was particularly ridiculous. He could have easily made her demise much more plausible with a bit more thought. What I did like about the ending is the ambiguity. The story is presented in such a way that a reader of a certain age might miss the satire and perceive it as straight and may well be inspired to pursue this course of action. It's almost as if in some way this technological progression has to occur. Overall, it wasn't a bad novel. Eggers is clearly intelligent and it was certainly original; I just felt that it warranted more depth. It all felt stretched too thin. Not his best book by a long stretch.
​
It's also annoying that he re-uses calligraphic as an adjective, which he famously deployed in the opening line of his debut.
Dave Eggers – The Every
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
Extends upon the ideas in the first book
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 2 May 2024
​
As far as contenders for voice of our generation go, Dave Eggers is the forerunner. His stories speak to our times like no other. Yet, somehow, his latest releases passed me. I quickly rushed out and rectified this situation. I devoured The Parade in an afternoon. I found it to be a spare, impactful and thought-provoking novella.
​
I then set out to read The Every. Of all his books, I don’t think The Circle is one of his best. It made for a great film, however, albeit one that does not go as far as the book. Plotwise, there is not much of a structure to this sequel. It is more a series of set pieces strung together. It makes for an unsettling read. Some of the ideas are truly terrifying. I found it difficult to get through at times; reading it in fits and starts.
​
There are a lot of interesting ideas in the book. I liked the meta-aspects in which it self referentially acknowledged the film of the former novel and the dissection of novel consumption and construction in the age of AI. The analysis of smart speakers was ‘on point’, to use an irritating phrase. The metonymy of the fate of the dog was a good illustration of how all are neutered by the corporate nanny state. I also found the academic’s letter about the connection between the controlling omnipotence of the Christian deity and surveillance culture interesting. The face of the blimp evoking echoes of The Great Gatsby.
​
Yet, for the most part, I found The Every to be somewhat of a dull read. I don’t think it was just the content that made it a difficult read, as infuriating as the behaviour of the corporate staff was. It was the writing style. It really did read as if parts of it were written by AI, plodding through until it gets to the interesting parts where it would suddenly become impassioned and astute in its observations.
​
Nevertheless, this is an important book and a necessary warning for younger generations, although the denouement doesn’t bode well. I’m not entirely sure what the overall message is. I was expecting an indictment, but the message seems much grimmer than that.
Dave Eggers – Zeitoun Review
​
5 out of 5 stars
​
Thoroughly enjoyed this book
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 7 April 2021
​
I thoroughly enjoyed this book, as I do with most of Dave Egger's output. I lent it to my grandad, who is 92 and an avid reader. He said it is the best book he has read in a long time.
David Foster Wallace – Infinite Jest Review
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
Should be retitled 'Perpetual Ennui'.
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 17 August 2016
​
SPOILERS
​
I finally got around to reading this. There are some absolutely inspired moments of hilarity - feral hamsters, the riff about the M.A.S.H addict, the Eschaton match, the bizarreness of the wheelchair terrorists; the motivational speech from his father was particularly well written; and the insights in to addiction and particularly NA/AA are fascinating, but the style of its writing is so dull and flat. Often it reads like a technical medical journal, interspersed with junky drivel, which is of course the point, but both are equally impenetrable for different reasons. It's almost like, for all his voluminous talents, Foster Wallace wished he was funnier. It did inspire me to push the intricacy of my own writing somewhat. I'm glad I read it, but I doubt I'll ever read it again. For all the inspired moments, on the whole it was a chore and most likely a very necessary one.
Depeche Mode – Exciter Review
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
flawed but sophisticated
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 31 July 2013
​
I got into the mode with the release of 'ultra'. From what I recall it was released around the time of 'adore'. Of all their music, I really like that one. I like strong song writing coupled with a dark synth. With the release of 'Delta Machine' I'd listened to pretty much everything DM had released except for 'sounds', gone off them and disposed of all their music, until the release of their latest rekindled my love for them and I saw them live where they rocked. Maybe it's just because of its fresh production and the foregrounding of Martin's fabulous guitar playing, but I like seven of the tracks off Delta Machine. It is by far their most well-rounded album. It's almost perfectly realised and they are clearly very proud of it.
​
DM is one of those bands that needs editing. When he's on form Martin Gore is an exceptionally talented songwriter, as well as singer and guitarist, but he can write a stinker. If you delete the turkeys you are left with several very solid tracks. I recently picked up 'Sounds' for a couple of quid. Of those maybe 'wrong' and 'in sympathy' are the only ones that will stand the test of time. I picture a sophisticated older lady at a large gathering every time I listen to the latter. Having missed their sexy warm synth sound, favouring a more organic acoustic guitar flavour of late, I went back through their back catalogue. After 'Delta' my favourite is still 'ultra' with six tracks I like from that one (barrel of a gun, the love thieves, it's no good, uselink, useless, insight). I think I was too young to appreciate 'the love thieves' and 'insight' at time of release. It also has my favourite videos. I think it's their closest to an Essex sound. After editing 'exciter' there are only five tracks I like, but those five are the most chilled out and sophisticated they have ever sounded (free love, I feel loved, goodnight lovers, dream on, when the body speaks). It's definitely their lovers’ album. I think people misconstrue the album cover. It's not extreme sports excitement, it's sexual excitement. Very seductive. Mark Bell's production remains the freshest today of all the albums aside from the latest. (I've recently returned to Bjork and his work with LFO leaves most modern electronic music in the dust). I can't listen to anything pre violator, although 'music for the masses' is their most classic from that period. the production just doesn't stand up to everything else I listen to. I've grown tired of 'violator' and only really like 'the policy of truth' and 'waiting for the night' now, and maybe 'the sweetest perfection' for its weird phasing, although that has embarrassing personal connotations for me, which have nothing to do with the band. Although it's a well-produced album, 'nothing's impossible' is the only track I like from 'playing the angel'. I don't like them to be too overtly Christian, which might ultimately put me off their latest release. As I have matured, I care less for clever electronics and more about good songwriting and the quality of Dave's voice (plus martin's bluesy guitar). It's their downtempo tracks that have stood the test of time and are most suited to the band as they age gracefully. They should definitely do some small venue downtempo gigs.
Douglas Coupland – Generation X Review
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
not sure what all the fuss is about
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 15 August 2013
​
I would agree with the reviewer that says this book is hideously dated (at least style wise, anyway). I found the characters to be annoying and the stories to be a bit hit and miss. I did not like the way the book was formatted, which made it difficult to read. Also, the footnotes distracted from the narrative flow. Some of the terms were quite clever, but they didn't all work. I can see how some of them caught on back in the day. The ending was quite good but I found the description 'mentally retarded' jarring. This is probably my least favourite of all of Doug's books.
Douglas Coupland – Generation A Review
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
starts off well
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 9 August 2013
​
I recently tried to reread this book as I was unclear about the quotes included in the novel. On second reading, the global aspect of this book is refreshing, and I always rely on Doug to be up to date and topical. This is very much a book of our present moment. I found the pace of the first section when we discover how everyone got stung to be a great read, but the reasons why they told stories to one another to be tenuous. The Superman story is great. I got bored of the book after that and didn't want to continue. The amoral Doug of JPod really worked and the tone was just right, but in this novel I think Doug was trying to be shocking and it doesn't impress. The foul language in places was just offensive, from someone who writes from such a beautiful place, too. I wouldn't read it again.
Douglas Coupland – Microserfs Review
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
struggled to finish it
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 19 June 2013
​
I've read most of Mr Coupland's books, but I've been putting this one off for some time. The premise just didn't really grab me, and on a cursory glance I found the writing to be overly detailed and jargony. I finally gave it a go when I saw a copy in a book sale for £1. Once you get into it, the first third is very readable, and, although a lot of the references were lost on me, I did laugh in places. Once loudly. By the time I got to page 246 the inanity of it all began to drag, and I placed it on my pile of books to go to the charity bin. It's only that I'd been forewarned by another review that the book had a poignant ending that I picked it up and soldiered on through. There's just not enough plot to keep you interested, and a lot of the observations just aren't that profound. As for the menstrual discussions, it may have added some authenticity to his female characters, but that was maybe a touch unnecessary, in the same way as dedicating a page to smegma would be. J-Pod, which is an update of this book of sorts, is a much more pared down novel and much more artfully (and craftily) carries Doug's message. Whereas Microserfs shows us a more worthwhile application for coders, bringing in Coupland's trademark humanity right at the final moment, J-Pod cunningly tricks the reader into finding a better outlet for their creativity. If Doug was an employee in Microserfs, in J-Pod he is the boss.
Douglas Coupland – Player One Review
3 out of 5 stars
a tense apocalyptical thriller marred by technical jargon - spoiler alert
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 5 August 2013
I borrowed this book from the library the moment it was released. I read about two thirds, got bored and skimmed the rest, so as to read the notes at the end. I've just borrowed it again and read it through in one sitting. I think Doug was highly aware of what he was doing when re-iterating observations from previous novels. It seems to coincide with the point in the narrative where he mentions Deja vu. I think the point that Mr Coupland is making is that his characters inhabit a world in which he himself has defined over the span of his career and hence have become his character's consciousness. It creates that sense of a memory echo whilst reading that allegedly the amygdala creates.
I'm glad I gave the novel another chance, as the action starts at just the point I left the story. I like the real time aspect and the time overlap component of the perspective switching. I feel this aspect is very well realised and would work well filmed. I found the characters to be well individuated and Rachel proved to be very original and made for an interesting perspective. The book develops themes hinted at in Generation A and Jpod. Every character had their motive for being there and everything mentioned within the narrative had a reason for being there. The weakest character of them all - the blind date, serves only as a MacGuffin.
I found the concept of player one to be interesting, but blink and you'll miss the explanation. I had to check back after finishing to confirm just what it was. It serves as a godlike omniscient narrator, but in this case is a virtual avatar created by one of the characters. I'm not quite sure what this perspective adds to the story, and proved to be the weakest aspect. I found the ending to be somewhat unsatisfying. Maybe because I didn't quite fully understand it. A gunshot wounded Rachel seems to inhabit a kind of limbo, which turns out to be a cartoon black hole that Looney Tunes characters disappear into. Here, Rachel, who is unable to understand metaphors begins to understand them and gets a glimpse of our future as a human race before regaining consciousness and going on to lead a fulfilling life.
As usual Doug's similes and extended metaphors are original and vivid. It's more of an exercise than a full novel, which allows Doug to meditate and develop on his themes of humanity and god in a technical age. Following this is a glossary of neologisms. This is a real mixed bag. Some of these are very interesting and could realistically be adopted. Others are complete garbage, and it is these that undermine the others. It's all a little too technical and dense. Maybe it will make a little more sense to me in a few more years, if I can be bothered to study that much. Maybe I'll be able to order a few of the conditions from the DSM and get Doug to medicate me.
Douglas Coupland – Shampoo Planet Review
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
saved this one until last
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 15 August 2013
​
Of all Doug's books this is the last one I've read. I was put off by the name and perhaps the cover. It is a very nicely written book. It's quite a simple story. It is quite naive and a little too cutesy in places. Doug's narration feels very young in this book (the characters are much younger). Stephanie was an unpleasant character (intentionally so), but she spoiled my reading experience. The ending didn't really work. I did, however, enjoy it more than generation x.
Douglas Coupland – The Bubblegum Thief Review
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
I always give Doug a second chance
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 23 June 2013
​
Nicely written book as usual from Doug. I've read it twice now. Not his finest hour, but not that bad either. I like the way the gum Roger steals migrates into his novel and is given to Gloria in the planetarium. It's a simple gesture, but it's all Steve has to offer. Seems to be advocating petty crime. Compare this perhaps to the opening section of Michael Cunningham's 'Specimen Days'.
​
For a while I thought that one of the characters in Roger's novel was writing Roger's world into existence, like some kind of postmodern paradox, but unfortunately that didn't occur.
Douglas Coupland – Worst. Person. Ever.
​
1 out of 5 stars
​
Worst. Book. Ever
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 28 October 2013
​
I've read most of Mr Coupland's output. He has his ups and downs, but generally he is a good writer. Despite a well-designed cover, I had a bad feeling about this one though, right from the title with its annoying full stops. This was followed by Doug tweeting that after a reading from the book nobody would make eye contact with him. I can now see why. This is absolute puerile trash. From the protagonist's surname - gunt - quite possibly the worst word man has created, onwards. The author embarrassingly attempts to shock the reader through strings of profanity after profanity. It's racist, misogynistic and generally all-round offensive. If I was trying to look for a meaning I would say that it was a misguided attempt at satirising political correctness. Instead, it comes across as a thinly veiled excuse for Doug to vent his spleen. In one fell swoop he undermines his entire career. It's like his true colours are finally shining through (either that, or he's spent too much time on web forums with teenagers). For example, the ending of Generation X is rendered redundant by his depiction of the disabled, or 'atypical'. Not only this, but it's not even a good story. Characters appear and disappear with the flimsiest of motivation. It at no point feels thought out or plotted. It's highly improbable that a former vagrant with one cataract eye would be irresistible to women. Nobody appears to even notice this throughout the entirety of the book. At one point the misogynistic scum and the street dweller are bickering over the shaggability of a woman when neither one of them have the right to even look at a woman. Some of the descriptions of women are absolutely vile. This is perhaps telling coming from a gay man. In my experience, I have known some gay men to adore the female form and others that find female genitalia revolting). I am by no means saying that this is how all gay men think, but it is something I have been told one. Interestingly he is coy about his descriptions of male genatalia. I would have given up reading, if I wasn't hoping that Doug was going to redeem himself at some point. He doesn't. Not only is it profane, it's tedious. Doug at one point types 'borrrrrrrrrring'. You can easily read this subtext throughout. 'I'm not proud of this...', 'was any of this really necessary?' As pointed out by other reviewers his English dialogue is unconvincing. Nobody says 'vinyl tote' for carrier bag. For a supposed comedy I didn't laugh once. This is the most dreadful book I have read since 'The Average American Male' by Chad Kultgen. Absolute career suicide. It's hard to believe that this is the same Douglas Coupland writing. (No wonder I found his latest book for children in Poundland little under two years after release).
Haruki Murakami – Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World Review
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
It's certainly original
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 9 February 2020
​
is a self-referential phrase that occurs at one point in the story. Indeed, the story is. Murakami's imagination is like no other. However, there are pages of exposition and the explanations are overly complicated. There are also sections of what seem superfluous details that are a chore to get through. The book is at its best when it shows rather than tells.
Ian McEwan – Nutshell Review
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
He writes beautifully, but I often find his work pretentious and ...
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 1 July 2018
​
I've always been in two minds about Ian McEwan. He writes beautifully, but I often find his work pretentious and irritatingly middle class. I read his work from time to time as my uni raved about him as their top creative writing alumnus. I picked this one up from a charity shop. It's an interesting conceit, but I don't think it works. It takes more than a suspension of disbelief to accept that the eloquent, highly educated narrative voice is that of an unborn child. I couldn't help but hear the voice of Stewie Griffin from Family Guy as I was reading. For that reason, I couldn't take it seriously. I enjoyed moments of the writing, when it wasn't too indulgent, but I put it down halfway through in exchange for something more suited to my lifestyle. I think Mr McEwan would be more suited to writing non-fiction.
James Frey – The Final Testament Review
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
simple, direct, dull
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 9 August 2013
​
I enjoyed the pace and direct style of this novel for about sixty five pages, and then got utterly bored. The section with the paramedic was interesting, but I found the style too simplistic to be engaging. The characters seemed a bit flat, too. Couldn't be bothered to read beyond page sixty-eight. Ah, well.
​
Jennifer Egan – Look at Me Review
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
Eloquently written. A prescient story.
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 27 May 2015
​
I read 'Goon Squad' a short while ago. It was really well written and I enjoyed it, but I didn't find it wholly satisfying. I'd even say that the PowerPoint slides were gimmicky. However, Egans squeaky clean prose and precise turn of phrase entice me to read another. Having now read 'Look at Me' and mostly forgotten the former, I must say, I preferred the latter. The characters were economically drawn and it was engagingly plotted. Egan excels at metaphor, simile and personification and her meditations on the nature of metaphor are fantastic. I found it to be a thoroughly engaging read and I rarely put it down. The descriptions of the mundane were just as captivating as the set pieces. Her prose is sexy, sophisticated, cool and she wears her intelligence lightly; a true sign of understanding. My only real gripe was an excessive referral to her sofa. I think 'sectional' could have been dropped after the first mention. I shall definitely read more. She puts other more pretentious literary writers to shame. I don't read nearly enough books from female writers.
Jonathan Franzen - Freedom Review
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
cheesy premise
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 22 July 2013
​
The prose is very readable, but the premise of the love triangle is cheesy and cliched. I gave up after 190 pages. The autobiography segment was frankly embarrassing. The rape angle seemed promising, but the book didn't warrant any more of my time...
​
Okay, so I was hasty judging this novel. I was in a situation where I had little else to do but press on with this book and I've managed to finish it. Now I can give a more balance review. I initially gave this book a two-star rating, but I've just bumped it up to a four. It ultimately has a very satisfactory ending, and is well worth continuing to read on. In fact, approximately five pages on from where I stopped, the first autobiography section ends and the book switches gear again.
​
The segment concerning Joey's business ventures makes for an interesting read, and the book seems to improve dramatically once the inevitable happens between Walter and Martha. I think maybe the flaw with this book is that Franzen is too convincing, whether that be embodying the prissiness of marital Walter, or the sexual immaturity of Joey, you would be forgiven for thinking that this voice was the author, if it wasn't for the maturity of other passages as a counterbalance. I do think there is a certain wooden formal awkwardness to Franzen's prose, and a certain degree of immaturity despite his obvious intelligence, as evinced in his descriptions of sex and the scatological scenes, but he weaves an agreeable narrative.
​
If you have the free time to invest, it's well worth a read. From what I recall of it's precursor, it's better than 'The Corrections'. If I were to pass further comment, I would have liked to see more of a resolution to the Joey/ Jenna situation and the implications
Kazuo Ishiguru – Never Let Me Go
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
Somewhat underwhelming
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 8 December 2016
​
The book has the universal quality of a masterpiece, but it's so very bland. The female narrator is very convincing. It started off very promising and for the first part I couldn't put it down, but it didn't really deliver on what it promised. (EAS99)
Leftfield – Alternative Light Source Review
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
Solid, well produced stylish album
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 29 June 2015
​
First off, great cover. It reminds me of the recent Deftones one. I must admit that on first listen to this I wasn't overly impressed. It not as iconic as Leftism, nor as, like another reviewer has said, as bombastic as Rhythm and Stealth. Maybe my tastes have changed somewhat during the hiatus, maybe I'd been influenced too much by the miasma of reviews surrounding its release, but I felt somewhat disappointed. Electronic music has become so ubiquitous nowadays that it has to be truly outstanding to make an impression. Maybe what I'm after these days is something other than more machine music. Having said that, I gave it another listen when I had a bit more time to listen to it properly. It's a much more subtle album than the previous. The whole album is solid from beginning to end. It could, however, do without the lyric from the Sleaford Mods singer. Even on this track, the underlying track is well polished. Production is faultless throughout. There are interesting touches on every track and sounds you have heard before in new combinations. Aside from the aforementioned, the vocals fit well. It's a much more techno intensive progressive album than R&S, as the cover suggests. If anything, I'd say that it doesn't go far enough, some of the tracks seem to finish before they have fully developed. For me, I think what's missing for me is the dubby reggae influence that coloured their previous albums. It certainly holds a lot of promise for the next one.
Michael Cunningham – Flesh and Blood
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
a world you wish to inhabit indefinitely
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 25 October 2011
​
I've yet to finish it, but felt compelled to share at the first available opportunity. As others have said, it is a little melodramatic, and effete, in places, although lovably so, even if occasionally you wished he would man-up just a touch, veering as he does toward the voluptuous. Even so, it is universal enough not to be ostracisingly 'gay-interest'. As with some of his other work, it's sense of fashion, and naive placement of cultural iconography - his own particular brand of contemporary vintage - sometimes comes across as a little dated rather than retro, whilst some of the characterisations are a bit cliche in their familiarity (maybe because the world his characters inhabit really is that hackneyed; the dialogue is certainly convincingly authentic), but, nevertheless, it is suffused throughout with beautiful encapsulations that take your breath away with their accuracy, and it is this easy detail - beautifully rendered images, and elegantly smooth descriptions of complex sensations and emotions - that keeps you turning throughout. You can almost hear the lengthy conversations from which his evocations are spun, like an approving chorus of femininity, even when he's doing misogynistic, which he does equally as well. It's ever so gently provocative, too. Not to mention subtly hilarious, and the sex is great as well. You'll be chuckling on the bus and making faces like a model, like you never knew you were capable. One to hide from your mother and lend to your grandmother, whilst applying lip balm, but you want it back.
Michael Cunningham – Nightfall
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
a cultured faintly snobbish gay man's fantasy
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 9 August 2013
​
It's many a gay man's fantasy that a heterosexual man would question his sexuality and fall for a younger attractive man. It's a one trick narrative that doesn't have much impact. The observations on the art world are dull and uninspiring. The story of the narrator's brother is intimated and never fully explored. Based on a few New York novels I've read, I don't think it's the life for me. Pales in comparison to his other work.
Michael Cunningham – The Snow Queen Review
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
A sophisticated read
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 19 September 2018
​
‘The Snow Queen’ Cunningham’s latest novel is a meditation on mortality, the ineffable and the creative process. Following a group of New Yorkers through the early years of the century, it depicts
the sighting of a mysterious celestial light, which happens to coincide with the remission of one of the narrator’s, soon to be, wife’s cancer. Himself a struggling musician, Tyler is trying to compose a perfect song for their wedding. Meanwhile, his younger gay brother, Barrett, who works in an uptown vintage shop, owned by one of the other characters, is unlucky in love.
​
Michael’s elegant prose is as beautiful and precise as ever. Sometimes the description feels a little indulgent, as his thoughts runs away with him, but he mostly keeps it under control. It’s a somewhat slight novel, with moments of profundity in the everyday, which might be the point: the elusiveness of higher meaning in our modern times. Once again, the author manages to convey a contemporary feel in a timeless classical manner. Sometimes the literary allusions were lost on me, but, on the whole, I found it a thoroughly enjoyable read, as refreshing and of this moment as a soy matcha latte.
​
Percival Everett - American Desert Review
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
I almost gave up on this book...
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 9 February 2020
​
... as the prose is so spare and unadorned that I started to get bored with it. However, I had a brief break and came back to it. Its economy of style is its strength. Its surreal irony is sharp with wit as dry as the desert it depicts. The dialogue, like the characterisation, is minimal, but utterly believable. The narrative is taut and unexpected with controlled use of flashbacks. Everett shows and rarely tells, in a very cinematic way. This should totally be a movie. Takes America apart at the seams.
​
Russell Hoban – Riddley Walker Review
​
5 out of 5 stars
​
the coda to this book should be:
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 30 June 2012
​
I did it best; I did it my way.
​
Enough said.
​
Great reissue covers, which first caught my attention, and drew me to this idiosyncratic author.
May he rest in peace.
Sink Ya Teeth – If You See Me Review
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
like a female Kraftwerk crossed with Green Velvet
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 19 June 2018
​
The a-side has a hypnotic bass guitar groove, overlaid with a listless mantra on the perils of excess, but it is the B-side, 'Circumstance' that is the stand out track. With a punk DIY aesthetic, the track opens to a drum machine, as a single guitar chord rhythmically punctuates some timpani drums. This is followed by a frequency shifting semaphore, before the guitar progresses to a 'maddeningly' familiar refrain, over a pleasingly tight syncopated stutter, as Maria dispassionately intones fatalistically over the synth washes, like a female Kraftwerk crossed with Green Velvet.
​
Sink Ya Teeth – Substitutes Review
​
5 out of 5 stars
​
Sounds like an elektrkla$h Deborah Dyer
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 19 June 2018
​
A muscular synth-punk dance track with sleazy bass guitar and high production values.
Sounds like an elektrkla$h Deborah Dyer, in a good way.
​
The Smashing Pumpkins - Zeitgeist Review
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
very fresh sounding
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 16 February 2013
​
I came to the Pumpkins late. I'd heard some of Adore and liked it, but didn't really discover them properly until the Machina era. I liked that album. Then I heard Mellon Collie, and the rest followed from there. Personally, I think Zeitgeist is a great album. A good two thirds of the album are killer. The irony is that as Billy's voice has grown weaker, his lyrics have grown stronger. Many of the earlier releases I can no longer listen to, as musically superior they are, I can no longer relate to the lyrics. I personally come from an electronic music background, and so like a lot of his solo output and much of adore. I also enjoyed a few, but not all, of the Zwan tracks. My favourite Corgan tracks are appels and oranjes, stand inside your love, broken heart, raindrops and sunshowers and a few off this album (bring the light, that's the way [my love is], Bleeding the Orchid, come on [let's go]). What I like about this album is perhaps the one thing that many don't like about this album, and that is the production. It has an unfinished feel, like a really good demo. After the high production values of previous, which they have been occasionally criticised for, I found this lo-fi approach to be very refreshing. There is an energy and vitality to this album that is very fresh. If you didn't know about their previous output you would say that this was a new band. Billy Corgan is one of those songwriters crying out to be covered by younger vocal talent. His lyrics are intelligent and thought provoking (particularly on the newest album Oceania - I'm not sure if the special k lyric is a reference to breakfast cereal or illicit drugs. If it's the latter, it's a bit hypocritical given his previous stance towards former band members.)
Stephen King – Billy Summers Review
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
A solid page turner. Stephen King on form.
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 5 December 2021
​
After a long hiatus, I returned to Mr King's works recently with Under the Dome, 11, 22, 63, Joyland and The Institute. With the exception of UTD, which I found a bit uneven, I have enjoyed them all. I wasn't overly interested by the premise of this one, not being a fan of war stories or snipers, even, but seeing as Stephen is back on form, I thought I'd read it.
​
The novel, as one reviewer has mentioned, must have stemmed from his research on 11, 22, 63. It's certainly familiar King territory. The first portion of the book is almost too safe territory, but it's a pleasant read and has all the familiar King tropes - a well-established sense of place and warm characters - despite the protagonist's unsavoury profession. It could have been written at any part in King's career, if it weren't for the technological aspects, which he seems comfortably au fait with. It would also be remiss of an American writer to not mention the presence of Trump, which is only in passing (for those concerned about such issue - as a Brit, I'm not so apolitical as some American readers).
​
It is with the, perhaps implausibly coincidental, arrival of Alice - the young female character, that the book steps into altogether different territory. I figured when the protagonist completes his job, midway through the book, that there was more to this story than originally presented. It is at this point the plot really picks up momentum, as it veers unexpectedly. I don't necessarily think that revenge is the solution to Alice's problems (domestic violence being similar territory, if I recall correctly, in Rose Madder), but it's to be expected from a story concerning a protagonist of morally dubious pursuits as Billy Summer. I'm not squeamish, as a long-time horror fiction reader, but the retributory act was uncomfortable to read in its casualness.
​
For someone of his age, King writes about topical issues with a freshness and awareness of someone much younger than him. Not wanting to give anything away, but these are very current societal issues. Also, Alice is drawn convincingly, to my male perspective, for a writer who has previously written somewhat hokey characters. I also found the flashback scenes very refreshing. It dawned on me, just before reaching these parts, that Stephen only ever writes about America, as far as I can recall. So, to tread a more global terrain made this book feel much more current.
​
Billy Summers is a nuanced character with various layers of characterisation. The conceit of the 'dumb self' is also a prime opportunity for King to broaden out into more literary territory and expect more of his implied readers, showing that King is much more than an adroit genre craftsman. The literary tone of Billy's cover identity also allows him to be more self-aware about the process of writing. I do feel that some of the peripheral characters from the early part of the novel - his momentary 'love interest' and the other neighbours with their young family - are somewhat abandoned, as indeed they were by Billy, but it would have been nice for them to make a reappearance, or be acknowledged in some way later in the book.
​
Overall, I enjoyed the book, even if the story treads somewhat easy narrative territory. There were also some nice references to The Stand and The Shining (that I could spot) illustrating the interrelated of King's universe (something that I believe was explored in the recent Castle Rock, which I haven't seen). They add nothing to the story, but are nice references for the benefit of his constant readers. Perhaps he'll develop them in further stories.
As a caveat, I will say, however, that the story did leave me feeling somewhat uneasy. This is in relation to the representation of women overall. Maybe it's a reflection of the characters and environments he is representing, but I wasn't altogether comfortable with their treatment. One British newspaper review helped me to focus my concerns. It's representation of feminism and women's issues are somewhat dated and not as considerate as King 'may' believe. Billy Summer's imperfect responses to Alice, I would say, are accurate. Yet, bearing in mind the story is told from a male perspective, I don't think the severity of Alice's incident was fully explored, or the consequences for her. I should imagine a female reader would not enjoy this book as much as a male, as it is not as empathetic as it could be. Also, the representation of war is unempathetically American in its perspective, something, to my mind, of a national trait.
​
Saying that, I do think this is solid King output. He writes with a control and assuredness that has maybe sometimes faltered of late. It may not be his most startling book, but it is an unfailing page turner, something King is masterful at. Perhaps it says more about my own reading and development, that I found the book a little insensitive.
Stephen King – The Institute
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
Mostly excellent
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 27 August 2020
​
For those that need it to make an informed judgement, here are my credentials. I studied creative writing at UEA, the best in the country and home of notable literary alumni, I'm a UK college English lecturer, and I've self-published a few collections of short stories, amongst other things. So maybe my insight is valuable. I used to read a lot of genre fiction as a teenager, mainly horror. I started with James Herbert, progressed onto Stephen King, before moving onto Clive Barker, and a few other contemporaries. Up to a point, I've read almost everything they've written. Since graduating, I mainly read literary fiction. Authors like Annie Proulx, Don Delillo, Douglas Coupland, Paul Auster, Michale Cunningham, Dave Eggers, Tom Mccarthy and Jennifer Egan. I've been called a snob for no longer reading genre fiction. Call it what you will. I look for something different in fiction these days that I don't often get from genre. I don't think there is such a clear-cut distinction, anyhow. A lot of literary fiction plays with the conventions of genre fiction (I'm thinking Italo Calvino) and some genre fiction is more than just plot driven.
​
I have fond memories of reading Stephen King's books, in particular Needful Things, Insomnia, The Green Mile, Teh Dark Tower books, even Joyland. I favour his less overtly 'horror' stories. However, I was also partial to his more blatant horror books, like Misery, for one. The Stand was probably my favourite. I recently tried re-reading it, but I couldn't really get into it, too wordy, besides I have a library of books to read taking priority (I recall, in one of his online interviews, him saying that, one day, you would have to choose between your wife or your books. I can relate. My near bibliomania is now under control. Once I discovered that I'd be reading them until I was 65, if I read 50 books a year, I stopped buying them). I tried reading some of his other more recent output, perhaps inspired by the excellent first 'It' remake (so terrifying it was like riding a rollercoaster). I tried reading The Cell, but didn't think much of it and put it aside. I then tried Under the Dome. That was better, but the ending was a bit of a let down (less said about the series the better, 'compulsively terrible' I called it at the time, yet kinda likeable). Then I read 11/22/63, which was excellent, with a thoroughly satisfying ending. The screen adaptation was pretty decent, too. I had no inclination to read Mr Mercedes, or some of his other more recent books (although I bought my granddad Elevation, after reading 60 pages in the supermarket without looking up), but The Institute caught my eye and was touted as something of a return to familiar territory.
​
I get the sense with this book that King was trying to win over a younger audience, whilst still appealing to his constant readers. There are a lot of cultural references that seem aimed at millennials. No bad thing, you've gotta love 'em, they're here to stay. However, there is a fair smattering of swearing and the issues dealt with, such as child abuse and interrogation techniques, that are very adult. Not that youngsters are naive - some of the stuff I read and watched as a teenager was far more harsh - but it's a bit divisive as who the audience is (a difficult balancing act). The premise was serviceable enough, which you can read for yourself. It was an opportunity for King to further explore telepathy and telekinesis, as he did in some of his earlier books. What I like most about King's books are his sense of place and the well-developed characters, as well as the set pieces. This book sets the scene well, giving him the opportunity to comment on incidents of police brutality - a very topical issue. I have slightly differing views on this, but I wasn't offended. Then the boy is taken. All of this is, as you would imagine, well handled. He then gets into the story proper, when he introduces the eponymous Institute. A group of young characters are introduced, all fairly distinct. The environment is well realised. The tension is expertly mounted, as expected. Everything works perfectly and it was an engaging read. The scenes outside of The Institute had me swiping pages like I haven't turned pages in an age (the last book that did was probably The Unit by Ninni Holmqvist). There is some action, culminating in a climatic scene. This is expertly plotted and flips between the the different threads like a great movie. Then there's a long coda. I won't spoil anything. The climatic scene was pretty decent, although I felt there should be more, something extra. After such an exciting build up, I was left feeling a bit underwhelmed. There were some truly great scenes, such as the video of gorky park - a great way to summarise and give more exposition, and the the back story of Luke's housekeeping ally was another opportunity to deal with some very series government issues. I also found the technical way he explained the supernatural powers fascinating. It all felt very contemporary and relevant.
​
However, I found The Institute's motivations a bit under developed, perhaps leaving more room for a sequel, and the wider facilities were given little more than a line, much like a quick flash to another country in a blockbuster. Also, the new power wasn't exactly a great revelation. This is not necessarily Mr King's fault. More that this is something that has been covered numerous times in the years since he first explored it, when it was original (I'm thinking how far Akira went). I get the sense that, in his attempts to ground the narrative in reality, which he does very convincingly, and is clearly well researched, he has limited himself in the set pieces available. The dots and the hum were all great, as was the 'cinema', but I just wanted that little bit more, something that I haven't already seen or read before, some other power completely unique, a deeper level of strangeness to the facility, or a new twist on the traditional tropes. The dream sequences and symbolism add a certain amount of mystery, which I liked, and were a good way of visualising the young captives' abilities. I guess my imagination has been stretched by Clive Barker. Also, maybe it's just me being forgetful, but, as the story progressed, I couldn't really visualise some of the younger characters. Stephen, if I may, is very good at inserting small reminders of characterisation to refresh your memory, but there were maybe one or two that had no real distinguishing features to me later on, perhaps because they were more incidental, but they became a blur.
​
I say these criticisms, as maybe we all do, in the vain attempt that Mr King reads his readers' reviews and might take a glimmer of heed. For potential readers, it's mostly excellent. There's a lot more to like here than to dislike. It was so very nearly an excellent. All the components work and, when it's good, it's very good, as good as anything Mr King has written. Line by line, I couldn't find fault. He imparts a lot of useful knowledge, too. The fact that he can still think up stories after all this time, having told so many, is a feat in itself. It's a wonder he still has it in him. I'm still psyching myself up to write my first novel. Unlike one other reviewer stated, he certainly shouldn't retire (unless he really wants to). I think most of his detractors are right wingers.
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
A bit too American, incorporating everything you love and hate about the country
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 18 February 2014
​
I haven't read any Stephen King for years, having favoured more literary reads. I recall The Stand as being an thoroughly enjoyable read, way back when. It's been a while since I've graduated in English, so I've started to lighten up enough to try some genre fiction again. I guess you could say I'd become a snob. Having read this book and I can now see that I've just become more discerning.
​
I'd recently seen the television series and found it to be compellingly awful, with a likeable cast, particularly the teenagers. Right down to the inclusion of a 'Fight Club', which made me groan. Not content with waiting another year for the second season, I purchased the kindle version of the novel to see how it all ended.
​
Most notable is the death of one of the main characters very early on in the novel. It is at this point you realise that the television series is very loosely based on the book. Another thing you notice about the series, having read the book, is how sanitised the TV version is. Mr King can be a bit too graphic with his descriptions and often comes across as crude. There is a lot of swearing in the book, too, something that thankfully is absent in the TV series. Dale Barbara's back story is different in the televised version and is an improvement on the book. Norrie Calvert's family situation is different, also. She has a more contemporary family, which is different to King's usual characterisations. Another thing I noticed in the book, which was less evident in the TV series, is the Christian aspect. They appear to have secularised the programme, so as not to alienate viewers as much. I think both are critical of religion, but the novel seems to be much more steeped in the teachings of the bible.
​
Jim and Junior Rennie's backstory is also more developed in the television series. The whole scenario with Junior and the bunker is not in the novel. Again, I think these changes are an improvement. In fact, having read the novel, I would say that Julia Shumway is the only fully developed character. The only thing I really preferred about the book over the TV programme is the explanation why Linda was so clueless. In the TV series she was cosmically stupid. At least in the novel you understood why she was out of her depth.
​
There seemed to be far less of an otherworldy aspect to the novel, too. The inclusion of the monarch and the look of the dome generator, some of my favourite aspects, are all inventions of the TV version. Don't get me wrong, the TV version is incredibly flawed, but so is the book. The final revelation in the book is incredibly underwhelming and the final explanation of how they got out and why is lame. There are a few good sets pieces and, once he gets in his stride, the action hurtles along, but it does tend to repeat events a lot, replacing one explosion with an even bigger explosion. The way he dispatches with most of the population of the town, also, it's as if he just grew tired with the story and wanted to wrap it up.
​
His provincial vernacular is infectious, but it's also this small-town vocabulary that offends. Lesbians being described as rug munchers, and the like. He also tends to describe his female characters by their breasts. It appears to be aimed at the most lowbrow of readers. I found portions of it, particularly his attitudes to the military, ingratiating. He tries too hard to be hip and down with the kids, too. Including apple products and dance music, which just feels out of place.
​
I don't want to go into analysing it too much, it's a big book. I haven't really given it enough thought to fully express what bothered me about it. I remember he character motivations to be simplistic and unbelievable. I can't, however, criticise it too much. It was a mindless read that I had no trouble completing. Contrary to a lot of reviews, I found his teenage characters to be the most likable and I was eager for them to return. I spend a lot of time around teenagers and you wouldn't believe some of the rubbish that comes out of them.
T. M. Wolf – Sound Review
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
Inventive approach, but it doesn't add much to the story
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 5 September 2019
​
I picked this novel up as a writer and a sound artist for obvious reasons. I've read about reading the illegible and found on a cursory glance the typographic style and layout intriguing. Having read the opening to the book, the prose also seemed to be educated. Indeed, I found the narration throughout to be cool and smart with economical description that gave a real sense of place. The layout was confusing at first, but once I got used to style - a melange of stream of consciousness, dialogue and ambient sound - I found it a quick read - the layout facilitating that. However, after a while, the layout and excessive spacing got on my nerves and I was turning pages just to return to the all too infrequent traditional prose segments. The story kept my interest for the first half, but I put it down for some time and read something more interesting, before returning to finish it. Having completed it, I came to the realisation that there is not much to the story and all in all it's quite a slight read. The characters are one dimensional and the narrative threads don't really go anywhere. If I were being cynical, I would say that, format aside, there's not much to warrant reading it. It would make for a quick summer read if you want some escapism, but I was expecting more significance to the visual stylistic elements. I may have appreciated it more if I were a hip hop fan and recognised the sonic quotations. Kudos for breaking with convention.
The Smashing Pumpkins – Cyr Review
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
Contemporary production sound and great lyrics
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 13 January 2021
​
Like a lot of people, I approached this release with trepidation. I have a fond place in my heart for their earlier output. I first came to the band through Adore, however, being an avid fan of electronic music. I discovered their more guitar-based music later. Maybe because I came generally to guitar led music later, I was hoping there would be more of a fuller guitar sound to this album. Instead, what we have here is a poppier cousin to Adore, of sorts. The first half of the double album is excellent. It has a bright, punchy, somewhat synthetic feel to it, which may or may not alienate some, depending on whether you prefer the warmer guitar feel of earlier albums. For a self-produced album it is very accomplished and has a diverse feel to the tracks that segue well into one another. The second half of the album is not so immediate, most likely intentionally, and tails off somewhat. They are more like sonic beds for the lyrics - more of which in a moment - than melodic songs. There are some great sounds here, but I would prefer it if some of them were a bit more immediate in the mix, as some of the tracks lack any real foregrounding, but maybe familiarity will differentiate them. Which brings me to the lyrics. What I have always found exceptional about their output, particularly from Adore onwards, is Billy's - William's - songwriting. Even throughout their less popular albums, his words have held strong. Mr Corgan is a true poet. This is never more evident than on their latest fare. Admittedly, some are slighter than others, as you would expect from such a broad array, but when they soar, they really transcend. Literary and mythological references abound. I've only just had a chance to cursorily review the lyrics in their entirety, but they are all imbued with meaning, some more cryptic than others; this is a substantial body of expression, in which you could pour hours of attention into unravelling. They really are something that you can study. As I have grown in knowledge and awareness, my life has been enriched and enlightened by their wisdom. He seems to have mined his own brand of colloquial literary elegance. These are deep sentiments wrought lightly. This album should stand the test of time for the verse alone. It might even be the defining moment in alternative 'rock' of the decade. It'll certainly improve your vocabulary.
Thirty Seconds to Mars – America Review
4 out of 5 stars
Great tones and frequencies
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 10 April 2018
At the risk of sounding sycophantic, I'm going to defend this album. Jared has long proven that he can sing very well, the autotuning is clearly a stylistic choice and not a crutch. If anything, I would say that he has the courage not to be precious about sounding real, in favour of the right tonal qualities.
The lyrics are almost irrelevant. All he appears to require are a few attractive soothing phrases to smoothly chant in concerts (it's very comforting - I'm not ashamed to say that I miss it when I'm not listening to it).
He seems very aware that this is a product 'sell yourself to save your soul' (sometimes you have NO CHOICE but to sell yourself 'there is no other way' he screams [wishing that there was another, I presume]). The album is serving a purpose to satisfy a current need - I'm not sure he is aspiring for rock authenticity or eternal canonisation, but is part of a greater plan, in which he is playing his designated role. (Besides, Chino joined him on stage, if you're looking for authentication).
In my mind, this album is more about textural qualities and tonal washes. If it's superficial, then perhaps it's meant to be. Maybe that is his message about the state of America. Yes, it still has the chanting of 'TIW', but it doesn't feel so much like a kiddy band, as it did in that instance, especially as here it is not overused. What lyrics there are feel more sincere and less embarrassing than the last two albums (on which he sounded like an angry teenage girl - no mean feat in itself), of which I only liked one or two tracks from the former. I don't listen to the latter.
Yes, it eschews his previous rock sensibilities for more of a pop sheen, but I like the direction. The album colours show that he is not afraid of pop sensibilities or appealing to the feminine, in spite of rock machismo. If anything, he should minimise the lyrics even further and make it an album of pure synthetic chants and tones, but that's my own personal taste. I very much like quality rock music and fine lyrics, but I come from an electronic music background, so his transition isn't as jarring to me and I don't take the change personally.
Admittedly, some of the sounds, as one critic commented, will date the album, as they are a bit disposable, which is somewhat unfortunate, as they grate a bit (especially on 'Hail to the Victor' and somewhat on 'Rescue Me' and a touch on 'One Track Mind' and 'Dawn Will Rise'), but it's good for now. I don't have a problem with the rap; my partner very much likes hip hop (great sub-bass frequencies on 'Love is Madness' - listen to it loud on a good stereo).
I don't think he should have front loaded the two singles, as by the time of the album release, they were too familiar and I skipped them to hear the new material, but they are still great.
I liked the epic feel (including the eighties hair metal porn star guitars - very cinematic [reminds me of 'Near Dark' ), especially the closing track - immense. You can hear a lot of these songs are meant to be licensed for films (you can just visualise 'Live like a Dream' on the closing credits of a film and a montage scene in 'Great Wide Open')
.Shannon's vocal is a much welcome addition (they have a similar yet different feel to their voices). I'd like to hear a whole album from him.
For me, the most successful tracks are: 'Live like a Dream', 'Love is Madness', 'Great Wide Open', 'Rider'.As for the Messiah complex - they all have it - that's the point. To me he doesn't take that seriously, as the costumes attest. If anything, I would say that he is parodying the rock messiah, for whatever agenda.
Ever since his days in 'My So-Called Life' he has always seemed faintly ludicrous, but that doesn't mean that, as teenagers, we all didn't want to be him. It's a hard game he's playing. Give the guy some credit.
Tim Maughaum – Infinite Detail
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
Very contemporary British dystopian fiction
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 8 October 2020
​
One of the quotes on the back calls this the first truly native C21 novel. I'd have to agree. It really is very relevant, with a Black Lives Matter riot in NY under a canopy of giant AR advertisements, an art commune on a container ship, an upper-class swanky dress party, acts of terrorism, augmented reality graffiti, digital spex and microchipped drinks cans tracking their passage from buyer to recycling plant.
​
I read it once and then immediately re-read it. It really stands up to a second reading. This dystopian world is very well realised - all the more refreshing for being set in the UK. It's exceptionally cool. I don't know about the technical side of protocols etc, but I found all the technology very believable. In some ways I preferred it to William Gibson's output (I only really like the Blue Ant trilogy). References to Jeff Noon wouldn't be remiss either, particularly the musical aspect - he knows what he is talking about.
​
You have to read it carefully to fully visualise it properly - the descriptions are very precise and economical. Lose concentration for a moment and the reality might not fully materialise. It's both a positive and a criticism. The negative being when it comes to the characters: some of their characterisation is so slight that it's hard to fully differentiate them. Tyrone seems to be just a young black guy obsessed with music. Ozone a big black guy. College an older white guy with dreadlocks that runs the music shop. Mary, a young artist with glasses who has visions of dead people. Grids an older shaven headed guy that has a pirate radio station. Melody a young black girl with hooped earrings (?) Jane (?) Claire (?) Sarah (?) Anika, Dutch, older, performance artist. Rush, Pakistani, gay orchestra of the revolution. Scott, white, American, gay, Rush's lover. That's about all I could glean from two consecutive readings. They are little more than types with back stories - serviceable to the plot. Just a little more development of them would have gone a long way, even if it was just a few reminders of traits as the story develops to better visualise them (something Stephen King is particularly good at). This would have enriched the dialogue, also. Personally, I would have preferred a little less swearing and a few less aints and fams, even if some of the yoot do talk like that.
​
I'm glad, however, that I made the effort to re-read it. I nearly gave up the first time out of near boredom at the half way point, which would have been foolish, but once you have all the pieces of the narrative in your head and aren't trying to figure out the plot, such as on a first pass, you can just blaze through it and enjoy the ride. I certainly would love to see a film of this. I've only been to Bristol once very briefly. I'd like to return to better aid me visualise his terrain. I'm certainly his target audience - a book that truly spoke to my preoccupations. I'm excited where else Maughan is going to take his imagination. Promising things ahead.
Tim Maugham – Ghost Hardware
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
Infinite Detail expansion pack further realises its topography
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 6 October 2020
​
These vignettes expand on the world created in Infinite Detail. I found them to be very well written. I don’t know if they were written prior to the novel, but I found them more vivid than the aforementioned. They definitely give you more insight into the characters. It has encouraged me to re-read the novel, as it has enriched my understanding.
Trouble with the Curve Review
​
3 out of 5 stars
​
A pleasant movie with a great cast
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 9 November 2013
​
Firstly, I have to admit that I saw this film for one reason only, and it's not Clint Eastwood, John Goodman, or Justin Timberlake. It's a gentle tale about aging and father daughter relationships, amongst other things, set against a backdrop of baseball. It's a gentle story with some nice performances from its cast. It's nothing we haven't seen before, but it's competently directed. All the cast seem very easy in their roles, maybe a little too casual, even. There are one or two cringey moments, namely, the grave scene with Mr Eastwood, and Timberlake's scene at the junior baseball game. On the whole though it is well acted. Timberlake is surprisingly natural in the role and has good chemistry with Amy Adams, who is always a delight to watch. She seems to have trodden the same road I have, and speaks the inverse of my own experiences. The aforementioned might be a slightly embarrassing singer, but he's far more likable as an actor. Both their delivery is subtle, although maybe a little too subtle, and would have benefitted from some amplification. Adams proves that she can swill it with the best of the boys, not that this is what we want in her. John Goodman is watchable as ever, and Eastwood is better in this than he is in Gran Torino. The story is predictable but tidy, and no scene is lingered on for too long. The father's backstory was somewhat underdeveloped, and the seriousness of it is not fully realised. With a better script Eastwood and Adams could have made more of this. I was pleased to see that Amy Adam's character was a vegan, but I was disappointed that she succumbed to the flesh so easily. Also, if she was a real vegan she would be much more flabbergasted by her father's comments about protein. I have read that the baseball knowledge is unconvincing. I know nothing about the sport, but it seemed believable enough to me. Occasionally, the dialogue doesn't hit quite the right notes, but it's on the money enough to be a satisfying watch. Don't listen to the detractors, this is a perfectly acceptable film. Maybe not a classic, but more than just a TV movie.
VCMG – SSSS Review
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
Peak hour techno from synth pop stalwarts
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 21 March 2013
​
I've been to a lot of clubs. I know what works on a floor. This is head down four am techno. Yes, it's repetitive, but that's the point, it's so you can get in the zone. This sort of music is all about texture and deepening levels of consciousness - getting bugged out on a freaky sound effect. This is quality throughout. Well produced from start to finish - you can tell they have some good equipment. I'd love to hear it on a thunder ridge sound system. It reminds me in places of Richie Hawtin. Yes, some of the sounds are a little retro, but it feels self-referential, like a nod to their heydays. Hawtin often throws in such sounds into his sets. On the flipside, some of the other grooves are bang up to date. Damn good going for some old boys! It would be even better if it was mixed. Stand out tracks are 'Bendy Bass' and the ironically titled 'Skip this track'.
Virginia Reeves – Work Like Any Other
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
An assured debut promising good things to come
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 8 November 2020
​
A novel is a hard thing to write. Like all professions, it's work like any other. I've yet to write mine, so I have nothing but admiration for anyone who does. It's an assured debut promising great things to come. I'm sure Virginia's voice will only grow stronger with each work and I'm keen to see what other realities she will construct in future.
I personally would have liked for more vivid imagery and more poetic language, but the book is neatly constructed and the writing perfectly serviceable. It's worth reading for the final section alone. I found the payoff to be very moving. I had a similar experience reading this as with Annie Proulx's 'Postcards'. She really conveyed the heaviness of a man burdened with guilt and the ambivalence of relationships strained by tragedy.
I shall seek out her other books.
William Gibson – Pattern Recognition Review
​
4 out of 5 stars
​
familiar terrain
​
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 16 February 2013
​
I was first introduced to Mr Gibson's work whilst at uni. We studied Neuromancer as part of contemporary American literature. I remember admiring the premise of the book, and enjoying its topography, but I found the dialogue to be somewhat weak. I felt the book to be a bit young for me. This was later confirmed when the author himself confirmed that the novel was a book for adolescents. I left off reading his output for a while until Pattern Recognition came out. I was drawn by the hardback cover and its interesting title. Personally, I'm not the biggest of science fiction fans. I favoured horror growing up. I tried reading this book a couple of years ago. I'm sure I completed it, but the second half was lost on me. I've since re-read it, as I enjoyed the locations the first segment of the book was set in as it was familiar to me, plus I could recognise who the characters were based on. It's probably one of the first books I've read which actually depicts a world I part way inhabit. I felt that it was speaking to my generation that few other writers, with the exception maybe of Douglas Coupland, do). The book jacket says it is his most mature book to date, and this is probably the reason why I have only just began reading his books. I've since delved into one of his bridge books, and feel that it still has that adolescent feel to it. Writing about a near facsimile of our current moment, I think it has freed him up from creating a believable reality and has instead enabled him to focus on the concepts and the characterisation. In Cayce he has created a very believable character - I really felt for her, which is unusual in this kind of novel - and all the rest of the characters are distinct and easily discernible. This book kind of haunts you, and, although the plot isn't overly complex, there is enough there to keep you swiping pages. The descriptions are very vivid, and the dialogue is intelligent and much more credible. I felt the ending was a little rushed, but maybe I just read through it quickly to finish it. It felt a little bit like a dinner party whodunnit. Maybe I missed something, but I didn't quite follow how it reached the conclusion it did. Definitely one to enjoy re-reading, and I look forward to reading the rest in the trilogy. The concepts sound fantastic, and it's just the sort of thing I get excited about. Uber-cool, even if I write uber.
Helvetica Light is an easy-to-read font, with tall and narrow letters, that works well on almost every site.

Smashing Pumpkins – ‘Solara’ video analysis, directed by Nick Koenig
The video opens with a shot of futuristic silver-booted feet, beneath a silver skirt, sat upon a satin mattress. We discover in the next shot that the figure is a white-faced ‘high and dry’ Billy Corgan, in black dog collar and jumper, illuminated by cool blue light and looking like Nosferatu, or a deathly war lord. This is confirmed in the following shot of a drone flying in a large birdcage – the fin de siècle image of a trapped woman, recontextualised in this instance as a man on the liminal of a new female Aquarian age battling to ‘tear down the sun’, so as to chaperone in the future and a new androdgyny, evident in his lower attire. He longingly gazes upon a motivational picture depicting a modest suburban home with the legend ‘Dream’ inscribed upon it. Into the room enters three women, perhaps a trinity, in white makeup with torrid lips, dressed in beige velour loungewear, bearing a chain. Somewhat redolent of former band bassist, Darcy Wretzky, as has been suggested, they attach the chain to the fetish collar and listlessly lead him out of the room. This is intercut with an image of a topless muscular man, looking machismo in horror-movie-style Ice Hockey mask and incongruous feminine white fur sleeves, holding a stack of towels.
The focus of the video then returns to the enslaved singer/ war lord, as he is led into a room illuminated by orange and green fluorescent tubes. In the corner of the room is a plastic swivel chair beside a drip feed, redolent of a chemotherapy station for a cancer patient. The next shot reveals that the ‘Jason Voorhees’ figure is stood in a room surrounded by birdbaths spilling dry ice, surrounding a small fountain, redolent of the garden of a large stately home, maybe belonging to the lord, that tracks back to reveal more of the room. Corgan sits at the chair, whilst one of the three women holds her long nails aloft. Stitched onto their attire is the image of a stork, the universal symbol for a new-born child, beneath which are the words tragedy. A close up shot reveals that the drip is raspberry flavoured XXX-Treme ‘Trauma Vape’, simultaneously suggesting childhood pleasures, menstrual cycles, and hardcore sexual fetishes. The solution is sensuously injected intravenously into him. Meanwhile, a butler enters the room with the fountain, along with guitarist James Iha. The butler adjusts his sleeves, as if ready for work, before an extreme close-up on the water in the fountain. As if vicariously experiencing the lord’s trauma psychosomatically, the butler spits blood into the fountain, as the lord exhales vapour from his mouth, experiencing the trauma as a cool diffusion, like sub-zero weather. One of the guardians flicks the drip, seemingly to expedite the drips dispensation. Iha washes his hands in the fountain, perhaps anointing his hands in the war lord’s bloodshed, or his possible demise, as he gazes threateningly upon Corgan, whilst perhaps washing his hands of the lead’s pursuits.
We leave this room to see the prisoner escorted through a yellow room in which new bassist, Jeff Schroeder, dressed in a punk anorak, is sat on a canteen stall, above a lilac rug, before drummer Jimmy Chamberlin. He is dressed in a blue boiler suit and bowling shoes, looking like a convicted serial killer. The pair are playing an artisan ‘Connect-4’ game with black counters, rendering an innocuous family game sinister, and the object of the game redundant, seeing as neither makes any connections. Chamberlin watches Schroeder as he contemplates his next move. The punk connection is reinforced by a close-up of Schroeder’s footwear – Doc Martin’s – a zip-fronted version of the iconic footwear of the movement, with equally redundant eyelets. One of the guardians holds the drone aloft, like a pet bird, suspended from a wire attached to her ‘canary’ yellow nails - the aforementioned birds used in mines to test for noxious environments. A close-up of Schroeder’s jacket shows a crudely stitched patch depicting a version of Michaelangelo’s ‘Renaissance’ hands, with skeletal hands in gloves, throwing off their shackles. Another shot shows that Chamberlin’s boiler suit is emblazoned with a yellow-nailed hand, mirroring the hands of the guardians, surrounded by white feathers, perhaps signifying the freedom that Chamberlin’s dirty work will afford them. At this point, Corgan notices that the end of his chain has been dropped upon the floor, but clearly left intentionally. Like a silent movie star, he slowly comprehends the significance of this and quietly unhooks himself, whilst looking askance.
He shuffles out of the room into a dull blue room where a painted face woman is giving birth. Upon the wall is a picture that is difficult to make out, but seems to depict polite high society. A doctor in face-mask and surgical scrubs tends to the ‘bump’, whilst two stony-faced mimes, in traditional French attire, stand guard with machine guns. They are seemingly protecting the delivery from Corgan’s destructive influence, and the possible ‘tragedy’ the women’s tracksuits portend, such a disaster possibly a trigger for the war. A young black assistant with exaggerated white eyebrows, stands before the doctor, making notes on a clipboard, his facial hair suggesting that this role is his life’s work. The inclusion of a mime-delivery and not a real birth, suggests that this is representative of all women’s births, vis-á-vis the birth of the future. The expectant mother raises her head to reveal clown-faced make up in the style of the mimes. She is clearly of Asian descent. Maybe the symbolic child belongs to Iha and all the youth in Asia. A close-up on the assistant reveals that it is a transgender woman. The phantom child is delivered. A tear-streaked Corgan looks on, as if no stranger to grief. He tries to comprehend the significance of what he has witnessed. One of the mimes looks on, unblinking.
The lord steps from the room and opens a windowed door into purple light. The strobing light is emanating from a dilapidated room in which a group of reclining figures ‘tan’ themselves under ultraviolet light. Redolent of the vanguard in style, their blue lips and safety goggles glow fluorescent under an artificial ‘sun’. The flashing illuminates another motivational picture inscribed with the word ‘opportunity’ and the caption ‘You Never Know Whats On The Other side’ and also depicting the same shack, and maybe he never will. One of the bathers, douses their face with a white liquid, maybe the highly fluorinated water that runs through our water systems and calcifies our pineals – our gland of perception. As Corgan leaves, a toy dancing bunny gyrates upon a plinth, its significance elusive, but with connotations of playfulness, innocence and new life. A catatonic bather gawks into nothingness – his future perhaps empty of anything authentic. The camera returns to Corgan, who escapes through an industrial corridor past what appears to be a dancing janitor - a reference to Nirvana's Smells Like Teen Spirit music video - through a space filled with next generation gyrating red plastic toys. He climbs up a staircase, illuminated by red light, conventionally representing danger.
He emerges with bleary nocturnal eyes from a cheap wooden home, similar to the one depicted in the photograph, albeit larger, into blinding daylight. Upon the wall is another image of the stork. The house is situated in a suburban American street. He removes a flyer, with ‘freedom’ written across it, from a car’s window screen that has a sticker with the words ‘safety okay’ printed upon it and a tick of approval. A white car drives past with an executioner rising from the sunroof. He turns threateningly to the lord, as if he is his next job. Another executioner chops a bush with a sword, as if to jokingly suggest that he is not hear to kill him, but just to do the gardening. An old woman watering the bush points to him, initially suggesting that he is the ‘victim’. However, Corgan follows her finger, which leads him down the street, along which he passes an aging overweight sad clown, sat upon an inflatable in his front garden, perhaps depressed from constantly entertaining people - maybe his troubled child - as a girl, most likely his daughter, plays upon a blanket. A close shot reveals that she is wearing a ‘Hannibal – the cannibal - Lecter’ mask, as she is playing with charred and disfigured dolls – innocence once again incongruously juxtaposed with evil, or the monster outside negative influences will make her. Like an executioner, she decapitates one of the figures, perhaps representing one of her tormentors. Further down the street, a man in children’s dog face-paint leads three overgrown boys along the street on reigns. The two younger boys are dressed in innocent baby blue, whilst the middle older boy is wearing ‘corrupted’ red. The overprotective father holds them back, as if protecting them from their fate, when it is he painted as the dog, the children’s ‘pet’, who is really being led by them. He glowers at the war lord, whose clutches they might be falling into. He walks innocuously across a lawn, upon which a Gothically painted pre-pubescent girl hula hoops, innocence contrasted with sub-cultural corruption, whilst a picture-perfect father, or older brother, sun bathes in ‘real’ sunlight, covered in ants, suggesting sticky confection, a potential plaything for the lord, or the magazine perfect false icon of an American suburb. Corgan saunters along past a lawn barbecue, attended by figures looking like glam metal stalwarts ‘Kiss’. They look equally imposing. They are barbecuing a red snapper, perhaps evoking the jazz electronica experimentalist, with whom he may want to collaborate, as well as the most commonly caught fish in America and a symbol of recreational lifestyle. A similarly garbed child plays on the grass obliviously, already converted to the dark side. A young woman holds a glass of milk aloft, as if mourning innocent youth - only missing her cookies - followed by the rest of the party, one of whom is the spitting image of metal washout, Alice Cooper. Another figure, in a yellow hockey mask, is sat before some bins, this one more conventionally tough and not as cleanly idealistic, perhaps unwilling to be superseded just yet.
The lord finally arrives at his picture-perfect destination, seemingly to enter his simple and modest idyll, but, as we all know, idylls are not real. As he enters the premises, haloed with a saintly penumbra, clearly fantastical, he discovers his trinity of jailers knowingly waiting for him, as if trapped in an infinite loop. After all, he’s nothing but a vessel inhabiting his own mental eversion. Clearly his escape was too easy and he has been trapped. It seems that there is no exit for Corgan, or at least not yet, until the women deign it safe to do so (perhaps when his ash will become a new time for the new generation of ancient arrivals, who are already ‘here but [from the] past’.)
Mixmag submission
What was that, mate?
As lovers of electronic music and the dance scene, we are all avid listeners. The whole scene relies on our capacity to hear, but what if you 'can’t'? Are we truly inclusive, or are we alienating a large proportion of potential clubbers? This issue was highlighted time back in the film ‘It’s All Gone Pete Tong’, in which a DJ loses his hearing. It’s not pure fiction, as there are deaf DJs, like Robbie Wilde from New York, who uses sight and touch to mix. As the Smirnoff advert from a few years back showed, deaf people like to dance and enjoy music as much as anyone else, unsurprisingly.
People rely on the primacy of aural hearing – through your ears – but there are other non-cochlear ways of hearing, such as feeling vibration through your body (and there are vibration packs available to help deaf people do such a thing). After all, aural hearing is itself a form of specialised touch, transforming vibrations into electrical signals. There is no distinction between hearing a sound and feeling a vibration. Sound is just a vibration converted to an electrical signal, which your body can do just as well.
In some part, the community is catered to by Deaf Rave, founded by deaf DJ Troi Lee. In an interview for Resident Advisor, he stated he founded the event as door staff would not allow him and his deaf friends into a club. Such discrimination is unacceptable. The whole scene is based on peace, love and unity through dance. After all, are the gesticulations of ravers such a far remove from the beauty of sign language? It is all gestural communication, a bodily expression of feeling the music.
It’s great that such events exist, but do we want to engender segregation? Shouldn’t clubs be making more of an effort to encourage deaf individuals to attend their events, whether that be by including deaf DJs, utilising light more to better represent mixes, or making vibration packs available? Maybe all clubs and festivals should have an inclusion officer, not just for the deaf, but for all able assisted individuals? Just a thought.
There was a rupture in the fabric of time and space. Reality was beginning to warp. Three alternate realities were starting to merge. Koi carp swam through a car park in some distant sub​urb, seemingly sucked into a vortex. At the centre of which was a magenta sphere radiating fragmented planes – polygonal shards that flickered and jumped to their own alternate rhythm, as the surrounding fluid became ever more disturbed. An ominous disruption of universal equilibrium, resulting in a thunderous clamour of twisted ambience that resonated at sinister frequencies. This blended space, a near synergy of dimensions, always perpetually on the brink of collapse, quivered and rippled, as you were drawn into its undulating centre that simultaneously beckoned and repelled. This disquieting semblance of unity threatened to destabilise at any moment, and the unifying bonds come unknit, releasing its inner tension in a thunderous clamour of energy that would destroy us all. Mutant dawn; aquatic cataclysm.
To say that Todd Phillip’s ‘Joker’ is a dangerous movie is to give it too much credence, but it is a deeply offensive one. Ultimately, it’s just a silly superhero origin story, but it’s presented in such a ‘realist’ style, and so forcefully, that people might actually take it as a serious movie. It has all the style and surface veneer of a classic 1970s movie, as has been pointed out by numerous reviewers. Visually, it can’t be faulted for its cinematography. It’s the script and characterisation that are lacking. Nobody would go into a film based on a comic book expecting a serious character study, but, by tackling the genre in the style of such a movie, that is what you are falsely enticed to expect. Unfortunately, that is not what you get. The viewer is presented with a mentally ill man, living with his disabled mother, who becomes a deranged serial killer who incites mass violence. This could have been an in-depth psychological exploration of one man’s descent into the maelstrom, that gives the viewer some insight into how a corrupt and insensitive society can push a vulnerable individual over the edge, as those well-known seventies movies did to some extent. Such a narrative requires nuance, sensitivity, compassion and tact, or risk demonising the vulnerable. The very lack of any of the aforementioned does just that – it sets back the mentally ill fifty years or more. What we have here is a series of episodic vignettes – admittedly in the style of a comic book – in which, through a series of gross oversimplifications, the put-upon protagonist slowly loses his grip on reality and descends into graphic violence. Each prior vignette is treated in such a superficial manner that they serve merely as lame justification for the gory set pieces.
Joaquin Phoenix’s performance is intense and physical, but, in the absence of any human depth, proves to be nothing more than a leering caricature. Lingering, over-stylised shots of his manic posturing does not equate to a meaningful performance, however fully the actor has thrown himself into the part. Instead, when the movie reaches its riotous denouement, rather than a criticism of the society that led to his downfall, we are presented with a film that seems to celebrate and encourage the very ills that incites his violence. Points of comparison are ‘Assassination Nation’ and, to a lesser extent, ‘Spring Breakers’. It is this very confusion, simultaneously vilifying the vulnerable and championing them as an anarchic anti-hero, undercutting the capitalist ruling class, that serves to further stigmatise the mentally ill. At the risk of sounding alarmist, younger viewers - older teenagers and those in their early twenties - the very audience that such a film is aimed at, or anyone else with a naïve lack of understanding of mental health, for that matter, could come away from this movie with less empathy for the isolated and marginalised than they went in, thinking the film is cool, when it’s far from that. For that reason, it is reckless and misjudged, but what should we expect from the director of puerile frat movie ‘Old School’ and laddy stag film ‘The Hangover’?
The Chicago based Colorlist, comprised of crossover jazz duo, the coincidentally named Charles Rumback and Charles Gorczynski, both multi-instrumentalists, worked long distance on this their third album proper following 2010’s ‘The Fastest Way to Become the Ocean’, released on Welsh label Serein records, after Gorczynski moved to Oakland, California. Rumback mans percussion, bells and melodica, whilst Gorczynski plays saxophone, numerous woodwind instruments, synthesizers and harmonium. Specializing in improvised song forms, live electronics, and sonic exploration they are known for their powerful live shows, having recently collaborated with Josh Eustis of Telefon Tel Aviv fame.
This reviewer has only heard a couple of tracks from their previous releases, but this doesn’t sound like a big departure, but that’s no bad thing. They have a very jazzy organic freestyle feel, which must stem from their improvisations. Songs evolve naturally over languid rhythms segueing effortlessly into one another.
​
The opening track ‘Sun song’ has a slightly mournful feel with a melancholy woodwind section and a flighty sax, which is also apparent on ‘Current’, the third track. That track is all tumbling drums and soothing sax with gentle guitar riffing. The second track, ‘Montreal’ is a laid back number with more woodwind swells redolent to this listener of the latter parts of Phillip Glass’s Koyaanisqatsi soundtrack, with its images of city skylines and tumbling clouds. ‘Waiting’ opens with an obligatory music box and chiming flutter of brushed drumming, which evokes icicles. Synths are used sparingly and unobtrusively. The title track paints an ever so slightly sinister firmament. ‘Where will we go –– ambles along like some burdensome pilgrimage complete with clanking cowbell. The rhythm alters cleverly at the two thirds point and ends with quiet majesty. ‘Through the fires’ has a winter feel to it again and is slightly more experimental with another flighty sax refrain wringing its way through a gentle cacophony of drums, which grows ever more strangled as the track proceeds. The tracks discordance grates a little after a while, particularly after such a pleasant opening to the album. The album closes with ‘Safe years’. Drums tumble again before it switches to minor keys with a seeming blend of synths and harmonium. The album doesn’t so much culminate as peter out.
Like a less robust - maybe more delicate – and less syncopated Dan Snaith during his Manitoba phase on ‘Start breaking my heart’, before he got a band and went all psychedelic. Perhaps it’s the Canadian connection with one track, Montreal, being named after the Quebec city suggesting the connection. The cover depicts a foggy sun hazed forest canopy, and the tracks seem to evoke a descent into and escape from a busy winter forest floor. No track particularly strikes the listener as standout, although Montreal is perhaps the most successful. After a pleasant start, the album meanders, but never really goes anywhere. The listener can’t help but think the duo are lacking in ambition, or have a very muted colour palette. Perhaps it would work better in the live environment where the full array of the instrumentation is apparent. You would never know they were a country apart.
Tom Hanks stars as the title character in this true life thriller directed by Paul Greengrass (Bourne films) depicting the attack of cargo ship MV Maersk Alabama by Somali pirates in 2009 - the first American cargo ship to be attacked in 200 years. The film is based upon the book ‘A Captain’s Duty: Somali Pirates, Navy SEALS, and Dangerous Days at Sea’ by Phillips himself and ghost written by Stephan Talty. Featuring a brief appearance of Catherine Keener and a largely scarce crew, the film is mainly made up of a cast of unknown actors as the pirates (bringing credibility to the film). Shot in a documentary style by Greengrass, a former TV journalist, the African scenes have a realistic feel. After a flaccid opening, the tension gradually mounts until the insurgents board the freighter. It doesn’t really let up from there on out until a brief hiatus, when the captain is detained off ship, before it wrings the emotion out of you for the final section.
As mentioned, the actors playing the crew of the freighter have little to do in this movie other than follow orders and react to the pirates. This is a two man showdown between Hanks and Barkhad Abdi as the pirate captain, Muse, who the aforementioned never got to meet until the attack was filmed on the ship. Abdi is well supported by his cast mates as the fellow pirates, who bring a convincing sense of menace to proceedings, even as things begin to fall apart. Particularly threatening is Faysal Ahmed as the hot headed Najee. Refreshingly, Greengrass depicts the pirates almost sympathetically and the hostage scenario is infused with humanity, even if, ultimately, the pirates stick to their mission and meet a befitting end. The relief as support arrives is palpable and it’s an emotive release after such a long build up. Touted for an Oscar nomination, this segment is superbly acted by Hanks, who is often criticised as being bland. This final section is a touch overlong, and the darker lit scenes don’t always make for easy viewing, nor is the dialogue always clear, but what is lost in clarity is made up for in authenticity; after all this is an experience.
Aside from being a reportage style action thriller, the film offers up little by way of explanation, unlike Greengrass’ previous film, the surprisingly good Green Zone. There is a brief gesture at explaining the pirates’ motives in an early scene, but this is not delved into any great depth. Greed and a lack of perceived choice appear to be the pirates’ only motivation. On a superficial level you could call the movie a criticism of the imbalance in power brought out by globalisation, but, ultimately, it still champions the superpowers. In fact, if I was being cynical, I would call the film an extended advertisement for the US Navy, but I won’t detract from what is a tense and gripping film throughout, which culminates with real emotional resonance; highly recommended viewing.
4.5/ 5
An all star cast star in visionary director Wes Anderson’s 7th film, recounting the story of how its owner (F. Murray Abraham, Amadeus) came into possession of the eponymous hotel and focussing on his escapades with Gustave (Ralph Fiennes, Skyfall), a renowned concierge, following the mysterious death of one of the guests, Madame D, as recounted by The Author (Tom Wilkinson, Batman Begins, and Jude Law, Sherlock Holmes). Gustave framed for the murder, they steal a painting bequeathed to Dmitri, her son (Adrien Brody, The Darjeeling Limited) and are hotly pursued by J. G Jopling (Willem Dafoe, Existenz), an assassin employed by him.
Let me start by saying that you have to be in a certain frame of mind to watch a Wes Anderson film. He’s a polarising force amongst audiences, with his legion of devoted fans countered by his detractors. Although not without their merits, this reviewer must profess to disliking ‘Rushmore’, ‘The Darjeeling Limited’ and ‘Moonrise Kingdom’, but thoroughly enjoyed ‘The Royal Tenenbaums’, albeit belatedly, and ‘The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou’. Without a doubt, Anderson is a distinct presence within cinema, and we need more auteurs, daring to push the boundaries of what mainstream cinema can be.
In addition to all his regular players: Willem Dafoe, Bill Murray, Edward Norton, Jason Schwartzman, Adrien Brody, Jeff Goldblum, Owen Wilson and Waris Ahluwalia, he has brought in the talents of Ralph Fiennes, Harvey Keitel and Jude Law, amongst others. All give acceptable performances, particularly Ralph Fiennes and Jeff Goldblum. Tilda Swinton even redeems herself after ‘Zero Theorem’ with an all too brief appearance. The cast alone is enough to draw crowds, although, disappointingly, many have only fleeting cameos. Fiennes is simultaneously charming and despicable. Tony Revolori, as the young Zero, is a suitable foil, although his appearance is completely incongruous to his adult counterpart. That’s a joke, right? (So why did nobody laugh?) None of the cast, with the exception of its lead, are given particularly much to work with. Edward Norton didn’t impress as he usually does, Wilson barely has any screen time. Bill Murray is underused, as is Jason Schwartsman, having admittedly had their turns. Willem Dafoe’s performance was okay, but not as good as his role in ‘Zissou’. I am not one to question Jude Law’s somewhat uneven acting capabilities, but there was nothing to complain about here. This reviewer cannot be objective about Adrien Brody. Saoirse Ronan was sufficient, but was better in ‘Hanna’. Tom Wilkinson was just fine for the part.
Aesthetically, it is perfectly realised and is a glory to behold, complete with stylised model exteriors and fantastic editing. Anderson deploys all his usual cinematic tropes: the high artifice, lavish sets, stilted dialogue, exquisite attention to detail, narratives within narratives, and humorous camera movements, only this time, for me, they weren’t as effective as previously. Admittedly, it’s probably his most realised film, only it doesn’t seem to amount to very much. Unlike ‘Zissou’ where the camera movements through cross -sections of the boat evoked chortles, and the doll’s house sets of ‘Moonrise Kingdom’ recall youthful innocence, which felt appropriate to the narrative, although his directorial stamp, proved mere excessive decoration this time around, much like the cakes Zero’s partner bakes. It’s all surface, which undoubtedly was highly intentional, but all it serves to do is distance the viewer, so that you never really connect with the film, aside, perhaps, for Gustave and Zero’s scene just after escaping from prison. It’s probably some form of Brechtian device, but what do I know? The change in aspect ratio, although harking back to earlier cinema, is just plain annoying. I’m a fan of Alexander Desplat’s ‘Birth’ soundtrack, too, but personally found his work in this instance grating.
It is mildly amusing and elicited the odd wry smile from me, namely during the destruction of a ‘worthless’ Egon Schiele picture by Dmitiri, during which I regrettably prided myself on my understanding, as the rest of the audience sat in silence, and the odd chuckle, such as when Gustave retracts his diatribe against immigrants, but little else. I almost willed myself not to laugh at times, so hard was he trying to provoke it from me, particularly with its supposedly humorous outbursts of profanities. I didn’t want to allow myself to join in the fun as it evoked a hoity-toity titter here or a knowing guffaw there from the audience. You could almost feel the majority of the viewers were trying to appreciate the film, as if you, as a viewer, are some way uncultured or lacking intelligence if you don’t get it. Using Gustave as a mouthpiece, Anderson comments in the film that ‘getting it’ is important.
It’s pretentious elitism geared up to prove the superiority of those who understand. It’s also highly conceited. I’m reasonably cine literate, but don’t profess to know all his influences, nor do I care, but I believe I know enough to understand his game. I just don’t much rate it. Personally, I was relieved when it was over. You might just love it. (I’m off to see what I make of ‘Fantastic Mr. Fox’.)
4/5
Sandra Bullock stars as a medical expert, alongside George Clooney, in this sci-fi thriller. The pair are stranded on a space station during a debris shower after a Russian missile strike on a satellite. The film depicts the aftermath of the catastrophe, as Bullock’s character comes to terms with bereavement. Mexican, Alfonso Cuarón (Children of Men), writes, co-produces, and directs the action. The two leads are also joined by the voice of Ed Harris as mission control, not that you would notice.
First, I would like to declare that this is not a review of the 3D release of the film. This reviewer still sees the format as little more than a marketing gimmick - besides, it gives me eye strain - so I can’t pass comment on this aspect of the film, which very probably adds a lot to the experience. Indeed, it is immaculately shot, and – I’m no astronaut – but, to me, once again Cuarón creates a very convincing reality; the anti-gravity seems very believable. The camera work is suitably dynamic and the props and costumes, one can only imagine, are authentic. It must be brilliantly edited, too, because you don’t notice a single cut; the whole film feels like one seamless sequence. It’s very much a spectacle. It’s the sort of cinematic experience you would expect to have at French theme park, Futuroscope. Although the score isn’t astounding, the sound design is also quite good, which slowly draws you in, particularly the use of silence.
The acting is sufficient, both leads turning out competent performances. Any other characters are incidental and disposable. Bullock is more convincing as a medical expert than Clooney is as an astronaut, but they both seem a little too like Hollywood actors to be truly believable. For the majority of the movie it’s Sandra Bullock’s film. Unfortunately, she isn’t given that much to work with. As pleasurable as it is, an hour and a half of her gasping and panting doesn’t exactly make for compelling viewing. There is, however, some fine physical acting on display from her, and the scene where she emerges from her spacesuit in the airlock to reveal her fine physique, as she curls up in the foetus position, is a beautifully realised image. Bullock’s performance is slightly evocative of Sigourney Weaver’s turn in the Alien films and she depicts an equally strong, but vulnerable woman.
Clooney’s machismo is overbearing, and you’re glad when he’s finally dispatched; he’s all vapid charm and charisma. His presence when he reappears later in the narrative is invasive, disrupting Bullock’s character’s feminine solitude and you’re glad when he disappears. If the film is saying anything it seems to be that this kind of bravado, although necessary to drive the story forward, isn’t really welcome in the new world order.
Although, the final shot is a very strong image of female power, ultimately, the film as a whole isn’t very affecting, unlike Captain Phillips, for example. There is just not enough of a story arc to connect with. Bullock’s back story feels just like that; scripted. It is quite a tense thriller, but not a tense as the film would like you to believe it is. It’s even tedious in places. Maybe I missed something in the reading, but there’s just not that much going on and, in the end, it doesn’t amount to very much. It’s up there, but it’s definitely not the film of the year.
3/5
In a World written, directed by, and starring Lake Bell (No Strings Attached) tells the story of Carol, a voice coach struggling to succeed in the world of film voice-overs and win the approval of her chauvinistic father (Fred Melamed, A Serious Man). Following the death of voice-over legend Don LaFontaine, her father, up and coming star Gustav (Ken Marino , Role Models), and Carol vie for the job of voicing an up-coming film quadrilogy. Meanwhile, subplots involving her sister Dani (Michaela Watkins, Wanderlust) and her partner (Rob Corddry, What Happens in Vegas), Carol and Gustav, and her work colleague Louis (comedian Demetri Martin) play out.
With an original premise and a script, which won an award at Sundance, I was hoping to be unexpectedly surprised by this film. Unfortunately, it’s difficult to see why the writing garnered an award. Lake is better known for her television work and it plays just like that. It’ll certainly win no awards for its cinematography; not something you want on the large screen. She plays the awkward card for the large part of the movie, which raises a few minor chuckles, but isn’t really laugh-out-loud funny. It is more successful in the more dramatic scenes.
Narrative wise it really plods in places and it’s all a tad predictable. All the cast are competent, but not particularly gripping. The unfolding relationship between Carol and Louis is endearing. It is only in the final few minutes that it delivers its hard-nosed message, and it takes a real Hollywood star to do this (Geena Davis as Katherine Huling, Stuart Little Films). The film also features other cameos from Cameron Diaz in the film in the film (which looks like a female Mad Max with production in no way convincing as a blockbuster in 2013) and Eva Longoria (as herself). The ending is several reality checks, particularly as, following Huling’s message, the sentiment of her father’s ultimate gesture is undermined by the fact that not only was he told to do it, but by someone younger than his own daughter. Ultimately he can only be pitied. It doesn’t so much pack a punch as gently slap you around the face, or is that sexist?
Final verdict: The film something of a tribute made up of a cast mostly known for their television work, it’s not going to pull a big crowd (this reviewer was a lone viewer). To paraphrase the script, it’s not the best film out there, but it needed to be made. Bell should be commended for her effort to further empower women.
3/5
Tells the story of the two weeks P.L. Travers, the writer of Mary Poppins, spent in Los Angeles with Walt Disney as he attempted to convince her to sell the rights of the story to him. Starring the ever reliable Tom Hanks as the entertainment mogul and Emma Thompson as the protective author of the children’s classic, with support from Colin Farrell as her father, Jason Schwartzman as Richard Sherman, one of the songwriting brothers, and Paul Giamatti as her chauffer; the film is directed by John Lee Hancock (writer and director of Oscar nominated The Blind Side).
Firstly, this reviewer knew little of Mrs Travers (always Mrs Travers, not Mrs), upon entering the film, and little about Walt Disney, other than his creations, so I can’t pass comment on how accurate a portrayal this movie is. However, it makes for an entertaining watch. Each scene that Hanks and Thompson share crackles with energy, the frisson between them is fantastic. The juxtaposition of this very English woman and an all American man is glaring. The script is sharp and witty and their dialogue sparkles. Travers is depicted as justified, but at times irrational, whilst Disney is charismatic and charming. The flashbacks that explain Mrs Travers’ behaviour are well shot and link well, but are a little flat and tend to slow the tale down somewhat. Colin Farrell does an admiral job of bringing life to Travers’ father, but it takes a while for these scenes to really engage. It is almost with relief that the film cuts back to the main narrative for more sparring between its two leads. The other characters are competently played but somewhat incidental.
We all know the inevitable denouement of the story, it’s just a question of how Walt will win Travers over. It’s all somewhat formulaic how this occurs, but makes for some wonderful moments. Namely, the sight joke about supercalafragalisticexpialadoshus, seen in the trailer, but also a joke about Dick Van Dyke (Upon seeing his performance again you marvel all over again at how bad his Cockney accent was), also when Mrs Travers first lets her guard down, to name three. Once again, it’s a case of the trailer taking some of the edge off the surprise, but it’s not all laughs, as it would make you believe, and ultimately makes for an affecting story. Particularly tender is the relationship between Travers and her chauffer as he challenges her assumptions. The intertextuality is well woven into the script and it makes you want to re-watch Poppins to see what kind of dialogue is occurring between the two movies.
Some of the same concerns that Travers had about her adaptation of Mary Poppins could be levelled as criticisms of this movie. Travers was concerned that Disney would take the edge off the story. Upon researching the back story of P.L. Travers, it seems that the same thing might have occurred in this instance. For example, there is no hint of her bisexuality, perhaps irrelevant in this context, nor how enraged Travers really was at her treatment by Disney. It leaves you unsure of how many other liberties have been taken with the truth.
The film’s coda appears to be about how creativity can re-imagine history to make peace. Maybe this is what has occurred with Saving Mr Banks between Travers and Disney, also. Ultimately, it’s a film about letting go, and in conveying that it is successful. On the flipside, by cashing in on the story of the story also, it seems that Disney got the last laugh. However you look at it, it makes for a most satisfying viewing experience.
4/5
Comedian Ben Stiller (Night at the Museum) stars in his directorial debut, loosely based on James Thurber’s classic short story of the same name, concerning the eponymous Walter Mitty, a hen-pecked daydreamer who escapes into elaborate fantasies. Stiller takes this idea as his start point and builds his own narrative upon it. In the movie, Walter works in the ironically titled negative assets department of Life magazine dealing with film stock. As he goes about his daily routine he daydreams of scenarios in which he can impress his attractive work colleague, Cherly Melhoff, played by Kristen Wiig (Despicable Me). His world is shaken up, when the magazine comes under new management and is to be restructured as an online publication and threatens to cut jobs. He becomes a negative asset himself when he loses the negative of what is to be the final cover image and his job is laid on the line. Mitty then sets off on a global journey to track down the elusive picture.
The more technically adventurous aspects, which make up the carefully edited trailer, only comprise the first third of the movie. These are the scenes depicting his daydreams. Of the whole movie, these are the least successful aspects. They are silly in nature, as would be expected in Stiller’s previous output, such as Zoolander, like the fight over a Stretch Armstrong figurine, but seem out of place in this, what is at times a very earnest film. Particularly, bad is the Curious Case of Benjamin Button pastiche. The new manager, played by Adam Scott (Friends with Kids) is too much of a caricature, also, to take seriously. The film improves a modicum in the second third when Mitty begins his pursuit of the elusive photographer, although it is still undermined by silliness. Mitty travels to Scandinavia, where Stiller takes the opportunity to capture some of the idyllic scenery. Unfortunately, there is a ludicrous scene where he encounters a drunken helicopter pilot. What is meant to be a rousing life affirming scene scored to a David Bowie song, creates a questionable message. Is climbing into a helicopter with an inebriated pilot really an act of bravery and dedication, or one of stupidity? Equally ludicrous is the implausible trade off of the aforementioned toy for a long board, seemingly to justify a scene of Mitty skating down a mountain; his skater back story in itself highly unlikely given his current lifestyle.
Yet, despite these flaws, and if you stayed long enough to catch the final third, the movie is surprisingly affecting. This is mainly during the scenes between Mitty and Sean O’Connell, the photographer, played with gravitas by Sean Penn (Milk) who espouses words of wisdom. The message seems to be that sometimes you just have to live the moment and not seek to encapsulate it, and sometimes you can go to the ends of the earth to capture the essence of life when it’s right there at home staring you in the face all along. Of course this is the big reveal of the movie, as Mitty discovers what the missing photograph depicts, once his mother saves the day (a brief appearance by Shirley MacLaine, Terms of Endearment). Ultimately, Mitty no longer needs to escape into fantasy once he realises that his everyday life is impressive enough and Melhoff accepts him for who he is. It makes for a poignant ending as long as you ignore the coda that life is to be lived just to make your online profile more interesting.
The film has come under criticism for excessive use of product placement. Admittedly, brands are at the forefront in this movie, such as eHarmony and Life magazine, but it could be considered as grounding the film in a realistic context. There are a lot of reasons for finding fault with this film. The plot does not hang well together and, as mentioned, at times the narrative devices driving the story are tenuous. It makes for a very uneven viewing experience; it often misses the emotional beat, but when it hits the mark it works surprisingly well. It’s certainly an ambitious film. It would be very easy to be unkind to this movie, but those who give it a chance will be rewarded; Stiller is genuine. Younger viewers clapped.
3.5/5
The Way Way Back is a coming of age story about 14 year old Duncan, played by Liam James (2012, Aliens Vs Predator Requiem), on a summer vacation with his mother, Pam, (Toni Colette, Little Miss Sunshine) and Trent, her bullying boyfriend (Steve Carell, Anchor Man) at his beach house. Out one day on a borrowed bike he discovers Water Wizz, a nearby water park, and is befriended by Owen the irresponsible manager of the park, played by Sam Rockwell (Moon). It is here that he finds his sense of humour; boosts his self esteem and finds a love interest, in Susanna the neighbour’s daughter (AnnaSophia Robb, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory remake).
Written and first time directed by actors Nat Faxon (Zookeeper) and Jim Rash (Minority Report), writers of 2011’s The Descendants (starring George Clooney), who both also feature in the movie. The film opens slowly and the tempo reflects Duncan’s sullen mood, understandable given the, erm, despicable treatment he receives from Trent. All is quite awkward and stilted as the embarrassing adults are introduced. The film doesn’t really start to hit the mark until the wisecracking manager is introduced. Rockwell dominates every scene until he becomes annoying. It’s testament to his acting capabilities that he shows his character sobering up and maturing just in the nick of time. It tackles similar ground to 2009’s 'Adventureland', starring Jesse Eisenberg, albeit lighter and less cerebral in tone. That’s not to say that there aren’t serious scenes, particularly the confrontation scene between Duncan and Trent over his devious shenanigans, which is perhaps a little incongruous with the rest of the film. The film sags at midpoint, but it is in its final third that it saves itself. The blossoming romance between the two young characters is tender and real and Duncan proves himself at the park. Particularly rewarding is the interplay between Maya Rudolph (Away we go) and Rockwell, and Toni Colette and Liam James during this section, who each gives the film an air of credibility. It’s also well supported by Allison Janney (Juno) as Susanna’s overbearing mother. Carell’s performance is understated and nuanced and it is a credit to his performance that despite all his awfulness you can almost understand where he’s coming from.
Overall, it’s all a tad predictable and formulaic with the biggest laughs given away in the trailer, ruining any spontaneity the film has. Some scenes should work, but don’t quite, such as the breakdancing scene. The incidental characters are amusing, but add little to the plot. The Trent aspect of the plot could have been a little more developed. Ultimately it’s a feel good movie that you will leave the cinema smiling after, but it’s not all positive, as they don’t drive home alone and Pam concedes her own weakness before imparting an important message. One of the better films this reviewer has seen recently, but it’s not as successful as Eisenberg’s 2009 fare.
3.5/5
Auteur Terry Gilliam poses existential questions in this science fiction companion piece to ‘Brazil’ and ‘Twelve Monkeys’. Qohen Leth, played by Cristoph Waltz (Inglorious Basterds) is a reclusive computer genius that works for the management. His job is to solve the Zero Theorem of the title, a complex mathematical formula, which proves that existence is meaningless. Having accidentally hung up on a call from a higher power, he awaits a ring back from above to tell him his reason for living. Meanwhile, he claims insanity in attempt to get out of work, and is visited by Bainsley, a seductive woman played by Melanie Thierry (The Princes of Montpensier), and Bob, the teenage son of management, played by Lucas Hedges (Moonrise Kingdom).
Where does a reviewer start with a Terry Gilliam film? There was a time when audiences met the arrival of a new Gilliam with much anticipation, after - arguably flawed - classics like ‘Brazil’, ‘The Fisher King’ and ‘Twelve Monkeys’, even the box office flop ‘The Adventures of Baron Munchausen’ has stood the test of time well, but not since ‘Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas’ has he made a good film. ‘The Brothers Grimm’ was mediocre and this reviewer never even bothered with ‘Tideland’, but, if reviews are anything to go by, it’s a good thing I didn’t. I gave him another chance with ‘The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus’, mainly because it featured Tom Waits, but, from what I recall, that film was a mess. At least in that instance he could be excused, as it was beset with the untimely demise of its lead Heath Ledger. I was hoping Gilliam would have redeemed himself with his latest. Unfortunately, he doesn’t.
It starts promisingly with stylish titles over a shot of a black hole. We are then presented with the shaven headed protagonist, nude at his computer console, echoing Bruce Willis in ‘Twelve Monkeys’. There is little discernible dialogue for the large part of the first segment. Outside the confines of Qohen’s disused church of a home, Gilliam’s world is presented as a garishly wacky vision of the future, somewhere between the graffiti strewn streets of ‘Twelve Monkeys’ and Luc Besson’s ‘The Fifth Element’. Qohen works at a mysterious console which is powered by cycling. His supervisor, Joby, is played by David Thewlis (Harry Potter) who is forever onto him about meeting his targets. He tries desperately to gain a meeting with Management, played by Matt Damon (Elysium), so he can gain sick leave. At one point he enters a large chamber, evocative of ‘Brazil’, another he meets a medical committee, redolent of the psychiatrists in ‘Twelve Monkeys’. Throughout, the camera distorts with wide angles and Dutch shots to convey his mental instability, in the vein of ‘Fear and Loathing’, but where that film was effective at conveying the drug induced state, this time proves too disorientating.
He finds himself at a party where he is promised that he will meet Management. Proceedings unfold haphazardly, leading him to the alluring Bainsley, who for the most part proves to be little more than a shallow sex object. He happens upon Management, where an all too brief interaction occurs, beyond that I’m not too sure what happens. Proceedings aren’t confusing in an unconventional plotted ‘Memento’ kind of way, but rather an unstructured mess. Admittedly, the sets are well dressed and you’re interested enough by this alone to keep watching, but mainly to see if the film will improve. People come and go with little reason and their dialogue is nonsensical. In many parts I thought there was something wrong with the cinema speakers as the words were barely audible. I swear at one point a character said ‘is that joke over now?’ after belabouring one line for the first third of the movie.
The acting ranges consistently from mediocre to downright bad, with the exception of Matt Damon’s all too brief appearances. Particularly bad is Tilda Swinton as Dr. Shrink-Rom. Just when you think it couldn’t get any worse, she raps. Lucas Hedges is not strong enough an actor at his age to carry his scenes. If I was being generous I would say that he made an admirable attempt at mimicking Brad Pitt’s delivery in ‘Twelve Monkeys’, which is a kind way of saying he was unsuccessful.
What there is of a plot is minimal. Qohen breaks his computer, Bob turns up and fixes it (or was it Joby?) they order pizza a couple of times, a strange couple in cowboy hats come and go, he engages in a virtual reality fantasy on a desert island with Bainsley, they split up, he realises the call was never coming and jumps into the mainframe, only to find himself alone on the island frolicking to a cover of Radiohead’s ‘Creep’. The whole thing feels self indulgent, even gratuitous; it’s minimal nudity seemingly in place only to titillate teenage boys. The computer graphics look cheap and dated, too. What’s more of a wonder than how fantastically bad it was is how I managed to sit through the whole film.
Gilliam should be commended for the singularity of his vision, but requires a disciplined team in future to keep his eccentricities from running wild.
2.5
Steven Soderbergh presents ‘Visitors’ the latest collaboration between former monk and influential filmmaker Godfrey Reggio (Qatsi Trilogy) and composer Philip Glass (The Hours), alongside director and Fischerspooner DJ, Jon Kane (editor, Naqoyqatsi). Filmed in 4K ultra high definition black and white, it develops some of the imagery from the earlier Qatsi trilogy in a new meditative sequence of 74 images.
Taking the image of a gorilla as a start point, the opening of the film juxtaposes images of the surface of the moon with the Unisphere in Corona Park, New York, erected to celebrate the 1964 World’s Fair. This is followed by the title of the movie etched in stone. What follows is a sequence of moving portraits and landscape imagery with abstractions of hands performing everyday tasks and a crash test dummy. Progressing from the lingering shots of bystanders from Koyaanisqatsi, the camera gazes upon mid shots of individuals within a void and almost imperceptibly zooms in on them. The faces appear to subtly morph with the play of the light, as the camera grows ever closer. This film is all about the human gaze. It explores the act of looking itself. The final shot clarifies this. It is about allowing ourselves to see ourselves as other, by looking at the familiar until it becomes unfamiliar. The disembodied faces almost look back at you and you wonder what the stimulus is that is causing their expressions to change. It is evocative of video artist Bill Viola’s later work, where individuals respond to something unknown.
This is juxtaposed with images of an imposing building, a swamp and a disused fun fair. Unlike the Qatsi films, there is less of an obvious agenda. The images are hung together, to use an art metaphor, to evoke a feeling. However, the images are obviously suggestive and we are gently guided into the sequence. The gorilla is a link to our primordial past, as is the swamp, although Reggio himself describes this as Pre-Primordial. The moon symbolises isolation and desolation, viewing ourselves from afar, and the Unisphere is a symbol of the future and where we are heading. The fairground might be a comment on the world we live in and the funhouse that John Barth said we are lost in. An audience reacts to what appears to be a sporting event. The hands are an extrapolation of the communicative gestures in Naqoyqatsi. It confronts us with new everyday technological tasks, such as using a smart phone, a computer mouse and a game controller, as well as playing a piano, devoid of any context and presents them to us in extreme close up. Disembodied, they become alien and take on a life of their own with thumbs become warring creatures. It is all about seeing with fresh eyes. The film is mesmerising from beginning to end and you cannot takes your eyes from the sumptuous images. It takes patience, but not to the degree of a Matthew Barney production, and no frame outstays its welcome. This is not as sweeping as the Qatsi films, but is a much more intimate piece, in some ways perhaps slighter.
I’m not one to comment on the music, but is unobtrusive and serves as a bridge between the audience and the image. It holds the piece together in perfect symbiosis with the content. It has less of Glass’ usual motifs and is perhaps the better for it, conjuring a sober mood.
The extras are sufficient: containing some lucid interviews with the key players and just reveals the complexity in what is a seemingly straightforward film. With what they were trying to achieve I would say that they were highly successful. I only wish I’d seen it with an audience.
5/5
Scarlett Johansson (Under the Skin) stars alongside Morgan Freeman (Transcendence) in the latest release from French director Luc Besson (The Fifth Element). The premise being that a new drug, which allows individuals to use more of their brain capacity, has been invented and is implanted in the abdomen of unwilling victims in order to smuggle it. Johansson is one of those people tricked into doing so. Her packet leaks, following a beating, causing to her evolve. She escapes from her captors and goes on the rampage. What will happen when she reaches 100% brain capacity?
Besson has returned to lighter affairs with ‘Lucy’, following 2011’s biopic of Aung San Suu Kyi, ‘The Lady’. This reviewer never caught last years ‘The Family’, but enjoyed ‘Leon’ and admired the visual inventiveness of the ‘The Fifth Element’. Requiring a lot of suspension of disbelief, the film will win no awards for subtlety. Bold and brash, it is drawn with broad strokes. No time is wasted with set up and the film moves along at an exhilarating pace. Similar in vein to both ‘Trancendence’, and ‘Her’, albeit more successful than the former and less successful than the latter. It takes its visual cues from Godfrey Reggio, John Woo, the Wachowski Brothers, a less sober Kubrick, and even Terrence Malick. In other words, it’s highly derivative, and there is little here that you haven’t seen before, but it has some nice touches, such as the intercutting of wildlife footage into the narrative.
The acting is very tongue in cheek and the line between intentional and unintentional laughter is never entirely clear. The film is very much a vehicle for Johansson, to elevate her to another level of superstardom. Her acting can’t be criticised, as she carries the film well, and she is convincingly agile, but sometimes you are left wondering what all the fuss is about. Morgan Freeman plays the same role we have seen him play in many a film of late, but adds sufficient gravitas to the technical jargon, however superficial it is. (It would seem that greying men in white lab coats and glasses equates to scientists.) The remainder of the cast is made up with stereotypical Yakuza types (in this instance the Korean mafia), casting which borders on the xenophobic. However, it is such a conventional cinematic trope and is treated with such frivolity that it never really causes much offense. You could easily not notice the amorality of Johansson’s character either. The plot often does not always make complete sense, but it’s less of a mess than ‘Transcendence’. There is a huge hole in the narrative between Lucy boarding a plane, enduring some kind of metamorphosis, or is that hallucination, and being captured. Other than the general preposterousness of the whole concept, most of the unintentional laughter comes from the imagery, which is not always entirely successful, such as Johansson floating on a chain, men floating on the ceiling, and the final chair scenes. It’s all pretty silly stuff, but it is clear that Besson is having a ball here.
Its final message is less profound than it thinks it is, and appears to be inspiring youngsters to appreciate their parents (Lucy’s lengthy telephone call to her mother), lead a healthy lifestyle (‘take this medication, work out and eat organic food’), stay off the drugs, man (a drug addled victim is swiftly executed) and have children (‘I don’t care about the scar [on her abdomen]), so that they can invent super computers and reshape the world in the style of an earlier epoch. Don’t expect too much from it and you’ll have a lot of fun. The last time I was similarly amused was one of the ‘Residential Evil’ films with Milla Jovovich (who was similarly idolised by Besson in ‘The Fifth Element’). Who knows? It might even empower you. It all depends on how much you admire Ms Johansson.
On first listen of Miami Beat Alliance’s debut EP, ‘Norfolk Skies’, you cannot help but think that it’s all somewhat familiar. Its minimal combination of frenetic hardcore breakbeats and simple melodies, very much in the style championed by ‘Rephlex’ and ‘Warp’, is derivative in many ways. With obvious influences from the likes of ‘Bogdan Raczynski’, ‘Aphex Twin’ and ‘Two Lone Swordsmen’ and a pastoral ness redolent of ‘The Boards of Canada’, one could construe that MBA are merely a poor imitation of their idols. Yet there is an assuredness to ‘Norfolk Skies’ that suggests that ‘Looky and Orn’, the helmsmen behind MBA, know otherwise. It has a sense of character and emotiveness – an essence of crystalline beauty - beyond the immediacy of its catchy melodies that sucks you in. With each listen its familiarity becomes reassuringly comforting and, much like Norwich, serves as an elaborate trap that is difficult to escape from.
It is not long before hidden sounds begin to appear; minute chatterings, ticks and whirs drifting to the fore and revealing a depth not initially noticeable. Each one exhibiting an almost inexplicable complexity and finery (that belies any lack of sensitivity that the aggressive breakbeats may conceal); a rawness of sound, seemingly untampered, with the intimacy of live instrumentation, juxtaposed against the highly processed digital sheen. And yet, such intricacy aside, there is also an illusion of infinite space to ‘Norfolk Skies’; an unclutteredness to the tracks and a sense that there is not much occurring. It is this balance which allows the EP to work its enchantment. As each note is allowed to reverberate, the music resonating through you in visceral waves, something happens between the gaps – the music begins to work its spell. The imagination runs wild and vast vistas begin to unfold, conjuring mental landscapes not just of Norfolk, as its title suggests, but images of much wider scope. Simultaneously rendering immense grey skies over the North Sea and purple dawns over Cathedrals.
The emphasis of such imagery seems to be in natural balance and there is an attempted harmony throughout. The sounds appearing to represent the incongruities of nature as its many opposing forces clash and clang and scrape and whir, shifting and changing, whilst occasionally attaining brief moments of equilibrium. Yet, rather than simply suggest the beauty in balance, MBA, much like the Icelandic soundscapes of both ‘Björk’ and ‘Sigur Ros’, also reveal the beauty in disequilibria. This theme mirrors MBA’s own sound - a synthesis of both black and white musical influences, particularly evident on ‘Leezar’, in which the picturesque gentleness of folk music is fused with the distilled essence of R&B (swing), Jungle (energy and grind) and Dub (dirtiness).
Tracklisting
The EP opens gently with ‘Dirty’, its organ solo evocative of Norwich’s church littered skyline. This is accompanied by a slowed down Hip-Hop beat that soon accelerates - with the introduction of a light harpsichord melody - into a full-on hardcore breakbeat. The beat, interspersed with the thud of a kick drum, shifts and changes gear throughout, until it eventually falls silent; leaving the harpsichord to play its idiosyncratic ditty alongside the barely audible organ accompaniment. The brief return of the breakbeat signalling the end of what is little more than a short introduction.
A slower but similar harpsichord motif – like a chiming clock of icicles - returns for ‘Leezar’ as a time stretched vocal hypnotically tells you to ‘feel your soul drifting along with the music’. The voice soothingly gurgles away like a small child, whilst a lonely flute softly floats over a fractured but heavy beat that organically evolves into a booty grinding dub swing. Just as you are lulled into a near comatose state, the deepest most sexy jungle bassline slides in like caramel, to warm your chilled soul. Moments later and, the ticking beat stuck in a groove, the bassline drifts away, leaving you desperately craving more. Thankfully it returns, seemingly rattling the speakers, before leaving seconds later; a marching band of squelches and ticks remaining.
A laughing baby signals the beginning of the more up tempo ‘Einen Zomernacht’, a lighter and more humorous interlude comprising a vibrating circus melody. Manic hardcore breaks and clashing symbols, interspersed with imploding sounds and hidden beats, rattle across the fore as a jazzy organ solo and a discordant accordion melody evoke France and sad clowns.
This is followed by the quirky ‘Water Rushes In’, the least emotive, and possibly the weakest full track on the EP, its wonky funk very much in the tense minimal style of ‘Two Lone Swordsmen’. A clipped techno hi-hat duels with a stuttering jungle drum and curves of bass, whilst a circus tune weaves in and out as a flute melody (yes another one) plays quietly in the background. Occasionally a distant voice materialises out of a rush of white noise, like an aeroplane landing (or water rushing in even) as the familiar jungle time signature arises regimentally from the tangle of beats. Then, as if worn out by the struggle for coherence, the beats sputter out.
‘Aayala’ attempts to join the less introspective sound of the previous two tracks with the Wintry mood established at the beginning of the EP. Tiny beats skitter and scrape like cracking ice, as an iceberg drum thuds between them. All the while a harp-like melody plays regally, before the whole thing disintegrates barely a minute into the tune. In an instant, the harp metamorphoses into a child’s music box, which skips excitedly over an energised breakbeat, only to return to the bitterly cold air from whence it came. The rhythm stops and starts throughout as the incongruous states wrestle, in an attempt at fusion, never quite finding a comfortable equilibrium.
A strong workmanlike piano melody follows in the shape of ‘wwwww’, that grows in complexity, as it partners with a flurry of bleeps, before running away like lovers barely a minute later.
The previous excitement is followed with the penultimate track, the more reflective ‘Flutes at Dawn’, as it slowly winds down – evoking the mood of dusk more than dawn – through another amalgamation of heavy beats and resonant flute melodies.
The album closes on ‘Mouse-Killa’ the most evocative track of them all. It's bloated hollowness suggesting tense, empty spaces; capturing the immensity of the sky or a vast ocean. Lone beats struggle to assert themselves, drifting in and out of aural focus, like a buoy on the waves, or a lonely figure walking across fields, before the peaceful serenity is suddenly interrupted. Great clashes of sound erupt from the speakers, the metallic sound evoking massive lightning storms, like clashing girders in the sky, or tumultuous waves splintering as they smash against bruised rocks; the sound infinitely complex in its density as it perpetually implodes and reforms.
As the echoing sounds slowly dwindle, you are left aching for more.
8/10 - an astonishing debut.
Watch out for the high-octane secret track (scares me every time) for a brief taster of MBA’s less refined, ‘forking hardcore’, live sound.
Lap(top)Dancing to Cr*p(core)
Produced for the recent ‘Brain Food’ night at the Norwich Arts Centre, ‘Crapcore’ features the highlights from Looky and Orn’s latest set.
Opening with their newly appropriated intro, which comically samples yours truly’s disastrous radio slot on UEA’s Liverwire AM, its very crappiness seeming to epitomise the MBA agenda (ever present in their lo-fi cover art, website and unpolished sounds).
Then the hardcore kicks off. Delivering 20 minutes of the savage breakbeats promised on the secret track at the end of ‘Norfolk Skies’, ‘Cr*pcore’ is ultimately more of the same, albeit less reflective and more dancefloor orientated than the previous outing - which is no bad thing. For a start it’s a much better recording and, so I’m told by L + O, more representative of the MBA sound than their debut.
Continuing with their hardcore/ melodic incongruities, track 1, jumps straight to it with a hollow breakbeat overlaid over a piano solo. Clanging and grinding throughout, as it drops those familiar MBA sounds, RnB hi-hats, metallic discord and those beautiful melodies, whilst throwing a ragga sample into the mix, adding a new dimension to their sound, rather than being a mindless sound-bite in the vein of Fatboy Slim.
Track 2 shifts tone a little, somehow managing to make the melancholic upbeat, stuttering ‘kick it’ as it’s tempo accelerates into DnB territory, before winding down into track 3. Serving as a brief respite from the breaks, the third track is a topsy-turvy accordion/hi-hat cut and paste workout, which rasps and whines as it struggles to stay in key throughout its brief length, finally fizzling out as it eventually manages a proper note.
The EP closes with the midnight beats of Track 4, an icy melody tinkling through the static of its digital fog, as unintelligible voices murmur in the distance. Evocative of a night-time stroll under hazy streetlamps, ears ringing after a night at a club, not only is it deeply reflective, but seriously kickin’ at the drop of a break.
Less structured than their previous outing, ‘Cr*pcore’ is more of a cobbled together bundle of tracks than EP proper, but manages to be equally memorable and as annoyingly addictive as ‘Norfolk Skies’. Keep the cr*p coming.
4/5 – Dishes up another rural beating.
‘Brain Food’ at the Norwich Arts Centre (27/9/02[?]).
Friday saw ‘Barracuda 500’ and ‘Substatic’ return with another ‘Brain Food’ event showcasing Norfolk’s Leftfield Intelligentsia. Representing the local talent on the night were such knob tweakers as ‘The Experimentalists’, Souls Held In Time, ‘SWV/Herbivore’ and ‘Miami Beat Alliance’. The uniting factor amongst them all being a self-effacing emphasis on their lo-fi production (MBA’s EP – ‘Cr*pcore’, Souls Held In Time a mnemonic [acronym] for SH*T, and Herbivore’s slogan – F*ck Sh*t Up - hey, I'm just reporting it). Lending support on the night was veteran ‘Rephlex’ DJ, Mike Dred.
Kicking off the night on the dex, event organiser, DJ Dave Breaks, warmed things up before ‘S.H.*.T’ and ‘Herbivore’ took centre stage. Segueing through their homegrown selection of down tempo techno and acid breakbeats, it was more than enough to get the gathering crowd worked up. Establishing a suitably homely atmosphere, they made way for Norfolk’s answer to ‘The Bays’, improv. collective, ‘The Experimentalists’ - Davebreaks returning amongst a whole host of other musicians bombarding the stage (many of whom having never met before the night). A cacophony of sounds filled the room, as DJ, drummer, guitarist, didgeridoo player, tablas and effects units all sounded off at once. Gradually the seeming mess began to cohere as the players found their groove, sounds uniting into a thunderous funk, rumbling and scratching in true jazz spirit. A thoroughly engaging performance captivating the crowd, as they shuffled to the building rhythms, before the whole thing exploded into discord at the climax.
A suitably large crowd forming, Dave Breaks remained on turntables as ‘Miami Beat Alliance’ set up - the announcer trying unsuccessfully to establish the next act’s name. Finally Looky and Orn sauntered onto stage left, taking up their places at their laptops. Greeting the crowd with a high pitch hello, there was little need for introduction as their own hilarious intro squealed from the speakers. Taking my disastrous radio interview from earlier in the year and mangling it through their laptops, there was no doubting their identity as they announced themselves in their own inimitable style. MBA were indeed in the place-i.
Hammering through a set of frenetic breakbeats, which threatened to collapse at any moment, the pace was relentless as they near destroyed the speakers. Pumping out ragga samples, dancehall, HipHop and R&B over their piano fuelled sounds the intensity was almost too much (Luke: ‘we just see what we can get away with. We push the limits - see how hard we can make it before people stop listening.’). Fortunately respite came from some beautiful down tempo melodies in the vein of their earlier ‘Norfolk Skies’ material, only to break out again into a series of hardcore pop R&B reworkings shortly after. As the pace continued to accelerate, the crowd tried their best to keep up as onstage Luke flailed about in a whirlwind of Rizla papers whilst the silhouette of Owen’s hair bobbed in the background (‘I haven’t brushed it for about five years’).
Arguably less proficient than their previous gigs - ditching the delicacy and diversity of old - it was still an awesome set, making up for the loss of refinement with intensity and humour. It certainly established MBA as an act here to stay, anyhow.
Finally, grandpa ‘Rephlex’, DJ Mike Dred, took to the stage for the remainder of the night, retaining the intensity of the evening as he weaved a texture of techno, breakbeat, garage and ragga into dancefloor maelstrom. Ending abruptly with pal ‘Aphex Twin’s’, ‘Come [to] Daddy’, Dred’s set came to a close. Prematurely over, it still beat the hell out of the average Norwich club night. Now they just need to sort out the club opening times.
All in all, a successful showcase for Norfolk’s close-knit community of beatfreaks, who generated a truly exciting atmosphere, raw and refreshingly new, with the promise of future success. In the words of Mike Dred, ‘Good luck to them’.
4/5 – ‘New, new, new, sh*t’.